Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 628605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:39:18+00:00 2026-05-13T19:39:18+00:00

I have a COM+ object which is not stateless (it takes a while to

  • 0

I have a COM+ object which is not stateless (it takes a while to initialize, and maintains large objects in RAM). I want to expose its functionality to other applications / hosts via web service or TCP/IP.

I saw that COM+ Component Services have a built-in capability to create SOAP wrappers and attach them to IIS. However, it looks like it doesn’t use the meta-data from the COM+ objects, and I am not sure whether I have control over the creation and destruction of the objects.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:39:18+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:39 pm

    You should totally forget the idea of using the built-in integration capability. It’s simply a bad idea.

    Instead, create yourself a WCF service to expose the object. The WCF service can be stateful if necessary, such that multiple calls to the service from the same client will all go to the same instance of your COM+ object (assuming it supports multiple instances).

    Is your object transactional? You can expose this through WCF, but not through the built-in “integration” capability.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 506k
  • Answers 506k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's happening because you're cacheing your cells and reusing them.… May 16, 2026 at 3:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I've encountered this numerous times and it appears to be… May 16, 2026 at 3:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Make use of the foreach build in function of Smarty… May 16, 2026 at 3:37 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Say I have a reference to a document object, which is contained inside an
Hallo! I want a blob object which I can pass around in python and
I'm trying to create an EJB factory class, which works like this: You have
I have a stateless bean something like: @Stateless public class MyStatelessBean implements MyStatelessLocal, MyStatelessRemote
We have some JavaEE5 stateless EJB bean that passes the injected EntityManager to its
I have a web service that accepts an Invoice, which contains LineItem children. It
I want to be able to do something like this in a stateless Session
I have problem with reflection, dynamic invoking objects and reading collection values. In Referenced
We have a .NET application on which has grown beyond what we can develop
I have a problem I want to know your opinion. I am trying to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.