Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7045389
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T02:31:29+00:00 2026-05-28T02:31:29+00:00

I have a complex set of bindings that include many private bindings to solve

  • 0

I have a complex set of bindings that include many private bindings to solve the robot legs problem.

Because of Guice’s limited ability to report intelligible biding errors, I’m wondering what effective tools or techniques, if any, besides reading Guice’s runtime exceptions are available to troubleshoot runtime binding errors.

Stepping through configuration code isn’t helpful, because the configuration happens at boot time rather than at object instantiation time, where errors usually occur.

The Guice graph plugin would likely be useful if it worked–my experiments with it have resulted in incorrect graphs.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T02:31:30+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 2:31 am

    I found the following two tips useful for debugging from this answer:

    • Grapher visualizes injectors. If your custom provider implements HasDependencies, it can augment this graph.
    • Binder.skipSources() lets you to write extensions whose error messages track line numbers properly.

    Binder.skipSources() is useful if you write generic binding helper methods and Guice only reports the line number of the generic helper method, but you (most likely) actually want the line number of the caller one level up the stack instead.

    I’m developing for Android, so the build time can be quite slow from the time I modify my bindings until I see the results of my changes on the device or simulator. So I’ve developed unit tests that will verify the Guice bindings directly on the host PC. Even if you’re not developing for Android, it can be helpful to write Guice binding unit tests as follows. Right now, mine look something like this (here in Scala–Java would look similar)

    class ProviderTest {
        var injector : Injector = null
    
        @Before
        def setUp() {
            injector = Guice.createInjector(
                new BindModule1(),
                new BindModule2(),
                new BindGlobals()
                )
        }
    
        @After
        def tearDown()  {
        }
    
        @Test   def InjectedClass1WasBound()  {
            val provider = injector.getProvider(classOf[InjectedClass1])
        }
    
        @Test   def InjectedClass2WasBound() {
            val provider = injector.getProvider(classOf[InjectedClass2])
        }   
    }
    

    I write tests starting from the most deeply-bound class. I.e., if C is injected into B, which is injected into A, I’ll start testing at C. If unit testing C’s binding fails, I’ll start commenting out the injected fields in C until I get the binding to succeed. Then I move my way up the injection hierarchy repeating this process.

    Of course if you follow test-driven development, and make sure to include full-coverage Guice-binding tests in your suite, you’ll detect these errors as soon as you break a binding.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some complex stored procedures that may return many thousands of rows, and
I have a fairly complex ASP MVC set of controls that set a data
For my app, I have a fairly complex set of configuration options that user
I have a complex set of data models that currently implement java.io.Serializable , and
I have a fairly complex set of C++ classes that are re-written from Java.
I have a fairly complex set of rewrite rules to give my site pages
I have a very complex controller with a very complex set of views and
I have several complex data structures like Map< A, Set< B > > Set<
I have a class holding complex scientific computations. It is set up to only
I have a complex .NET Remoting server app that provides a couple of services.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.