Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 825643
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T03:17:21+00:00 2026-05-15T03:17:21+00:00

i have a database that already has a users table COLUMNS: userID – int

  • 0

i have a database that already has a users table

COLUMNS:
userID – int
loginName – string
First – string
Last – string

i just installed the asp.net membership table. Right now all of my tables are joined into my users table foreign keyed into the “userId” field

How do i integrate asp.net_users table into my schema? here are the ideas i thought of:

  1. Add a membership_id field to my users table and on new inserts, include that new field in my users table. This seems like the cleanest way as i dont need to break any existing relationships.

  2. break all existing relationship and move all of the fields in my user table into the asp.net_users table. This seems like a pain but ultimately will lead to the most simple, normalized solution

any thoughts?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T03:17:21+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:17 am

    I regularly use all manner of provider stacks with great success.

    I am going to proceed with the respectful observation that your experience with the SqlProvider stack is limited and that the path of least resistance seems to you to be to splice into aspnet_db.

    The abstract provider stack provides cleanly separated feature sets that compliment and interact with each other in an intuitive way… if you take the time to understand how it works.

    And by extension, while not perfect, the SqlProviders provide a very robust backing store for the extensive personalization and security facilities that underly the asp.net runtime.

    The more effort you make to understand the workings of these facilities, focusing less on how to modify (read: break) the existing schema and more on how to envision how your existing data could fit into the existing schema the less effort you will ultimately expend in order to ultimately end up with a robust, easily understandable security and personalization system that you did not have to design, write, test and maintain.

    Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying not to customize the providers. That is the whole point of an abstract factory pattern. But before you take it upon yourself to splice into a database/schema/critical infrastructural system it would behoove you to better understand it.

    And once you get to that point you will start to see how simple life can be if you concentrate on learning how to make systems that have thousands of man hours in dev time and countless users every minute of every day work for you the more actual work you will get done on the things that really interest you and your stakeholders.

    So – let me suggest that you import your users into the aspnet_db/sqlprovider stack and leverage the facilities provided.

    The userId in aspnet_db is a guid and should remain that way for very many reasons. If you need to retain the original integral user identifier – stash it in the mobile pin field for reference.

    Membership is where you want to place information that is relevant to security and identification. User name, password, etc.

    Profiles is where you want to place volitile meta like names and site preferences.

    Anyway – what I am trying to say is that you need to have a better understanding of the database and the providers before you hack it. Start of by understanding how to use it as provided and your experience will be more fruitful.

    Good luck.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 503k
  • Answers 503k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Usually from the documentation and headers. If you don't have… May 16, 2026 at 2:47 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Do this in SQL, not PHP: create table artificial_range( int… May 16, 2026 at 2:47 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The ’ is typical for a UTF-8 encoded curly singlequote… May 16, 2026 at 2:47 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

OK I have a table that has two columns, userID and courseID. It is
Lets say I have a simple table that only contains two columns: MailingListUser -
I have ten fields in my table in database..And two columns out of them
I have a fairly complicated join query that I use with my database. Upon
Say I have domain objects corresponding to Posts and Users . Nevertheless, I have
I have a PHP MySQL application which has a modular design. There are about
I had a constraint in a table CREATE TABLE USERSAPPLICATIONS ( USERID NUMBER NOT
I am currently working on a project which has Employee, Manager entities. At the
I have been struggling with not being able to have the EntityManager be instantiated
I have the necessity for a client application to lock (aka check-out certain business

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.