Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7730079
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T06:07:58+00:00 2026-06-01T06:07:58+00:00

I have a Makefile that looks something like this: sometarget: command_one # calls fork()

  • 0

I have a Makefile that looks something like this:

sometarget: 
    command_one    # calls fork()
    command_two

Here’s the problem I’m running into when I do make sometarget:

  1. command_one starts and eventually calls fork().

  2. The child process execs something and finishes early, returning control to make before all the processing of command_one is done.

  3. command_two then executes before the parent completes, causing the sequence to fail (as it depends on command_one finishing completely).

I can change command_one (the fork() and exec() have to stay, though), and I’d rather not change the Makefile if possible. Is there a way to prevent the child process from returning (on Linux)? I’m thinking the answer is no, but I’ve been wrong before…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T06:07:59+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 6:07 am

    It sounds like your command_one looks something like this pseudo-code:

    main() {
        pid_t child = fork();    /* ignore error for sake of example */
        if (child) {
            /* some work in the parent */
            exit;
        } else {
            /* some work in the child */
        }
        exit;
    }
    

    If you insert a waitpid(2) or wait(2) (or any member of the family) immediately before the parent’s exit, it’ll make sure both child and parent are finished before make(1) moves onto the next command. It’ll look something more like this:

    main() {
        pid_t child = fork();    /* ignore error for sake of example */
        if (child) {
            /* some work in the parent */
            exit;
        } else {
            /* some work in the child */
        }
        waitpid(child, &status, 0);  /* NEW LINE */
        exit(&status);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a Makefile that looks like this CXX = g++ -O2 -Wall all:
I have a Makefile.am file right now that looks like this: lib_LIBRARIES = foo.a
I have a GNU Makefile that looks a bit like this: LIST = item1
I have a makefile that looks like: default: lua blah.lua Now, in Vim, I
I have a makefile with rules that look like this: data/foo-trunk.xml: svn log -v
I have a section of makefile that has this sort of structure: bob: ifdef
I have a Makefile that starts a Django web server. I would like the
I have a multi module maven project which looks something like: main component_one subcomponent_bob
Hopefully this is a very simple question. I have a makefile pattern rule that
I have a working makefile that builds with mingw32. Now i renamed that makefile

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.