Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 315957
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T08:20:22+00:00 2026-05-12T08:20:22+00:00

I have a parent Obj-C object containing (in a collection) a bunch of objects

  • 0

I have a “parent” Obj-C object containing (in a collection) a bunch of objects whose instance variables point to one another, possibly circularly (fear not, no retaining going on between these “siblings”). I write the parent object to XML, which of course involves (among other things) writing out its “children”, in no particular order, and due to the possible circularity, I replace these references between the children with unique IDs that each child has.

The problem is reading this XML back in… as I create one “child”, I come across an ID, but there’s no guarantee the object it refers to has been created yet. Since the references are possibly circular, there isn’t even an order in which to read them that solves this problem.

What do I do? My current solution is to replace (in the actual instance variables) the references with strings containing the unique IDs. This is nasty, though, because to use these instance variables, instead of something like [oneObject aSibling] I now have to do something like [theParent childWithID:[oneObject aSiblingID]]. I suppose I could create an aSibling method to simplify things, but it feels like there’s a cleaner way than all this. Is there?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T08:20:22+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 8:20 am

    This sounds an awful lot like you are re-inventing NSCoding as it handles circular references, etc… Now, there might be a good reason to re-invent that wheel. Only you can answer that question.

    In any case, sounds like you want a two pass unarchival process.

    Pass 1: Grab all the objects out of the backing store and reconstitute. As each object comes out, shove it in a dictionary or map with the UID as the key. Whenever an object contains a UID, register the object as needing to be fixed up; add it to a set or array that you keep around during unarchival.

    Pass 2: Walk the set or array of objects that need to be fixed up and fix ’em up, replacing the UIDs with objects from the map you built in pass #1.

    I hit a bit of parse error on that last paragraph. Assuming your classes are sensibly declared, they ought to be able to repair themselves on the fly.

    (All things considered, this is exactly the kind of data structure that is much easier to implement in a GC’d environment. If you are targeting Mac OS X, not the iPhone, turning on GC is going to make your life easier, most likely)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a parent object which has a one to many relationship with an
I have a parent class which contains a child object. I am using set
I have the following (nested) object: obj: { subObj: { foo: 'hello world' }
I have a DOM object obj of the type <input> , and want to
I have an extension : public static T GetPrivatePropertyValue<T>(this object obj, string propName) {
In Java: Parent obj = new Child(); I created an object of type Parent.
In Actionscipt, Parent means the object which contains the instance. So if a car
I have parent/child relationship set up via Node Reference. A Child record can have
When you have parent-child tables and you wish to use a DetailsView to edit
If you have Parent has_many :children Child Is there any reason a foreign key

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.