Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 589733
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T15:27:17+00:00 2026-05-13T15:27:17+00:00

I have a program which takes various command line arguments. For the sake of

  • 0

I have a program which takes various command line arguments. For the sake of simplification, we will say it takes 3 flags, -a, -b, and -c, and use the following code to parse my arguments:

    int c;
    while((c =  getopt(argc, argv, ":a:b:c")) != EOF)
    {
        switch (c)
        {
             case 'a':
                 cout << optarg << endl;
                 break;
             case 'b':
                 cout << optarg << endl;
                 break;
             case ':':
                 cerr << "Missing option." << endl;
                 exit(1);
                 break;
        }
    }

note: a, and b take parameters after the flag.

But I run into an issue if I invoke my program say with

./myprog -a -b parameterForB

where I forgot parameterForA, the parameterForA (represented by optarg) is returned as -b and parameterForB is considered an option with no parameter and optind is set to the index of parameterForB in argv.

The desired behavior in this situation would be that ':' is returned after no argument is found for -a, and Missing option. is printed to standard error. However, that only occurs in the event that -a is the last parameter passed into the program.

I guess the question is: is there a way to make getopt() assume that no options will begin with -?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T15:27:17+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 3:27 pm

    See the POSIX standard definition for getopt. It says that

    If it [getopt] detects a missing
    option-argument, it shall return the
    colon character ( ‘:’ ) if the first
    character of optstring was a colon, or
    a question-mark character ( ‘?’ )
    otherwise.

    As for that detection,

    1. If the option was the last character in the string pointed to by
      an element of argv, then optarg shall
      contain the next element of argv, and
      optind shall be incremented by 2. If
      the resulting value of optind is
      greater than argc, this indicates a
      missing option-argument, and getopt()
      shall return an error indication.
    2. Otherwise, optarg shall point to the string following the option
      character in that element of argv, and
      optind shall be incremented by 1.

    It looks like getopt is defined not to do what you want, so you have to implement the check yourself. Fortunately, you can do that by inspecting *optarg and changing optind yourself.

    int c, prev_ind;
    while(prev_ind = optind, (c =  getopt(argc, argv, ":a:b:c")) != EOF)
    {
        if ( optind == prev_ind + 2 && *optarg == '-' ) {
            c = ':';
            -- optind;
        }
        switch ( …
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider this problem: I have a program which should fetch (let's say) 100 records
I have a program which needs to behave slightly differently on Tiger than on
I have a program which deliberately performs a divide by zero (and stores the
I have a program which has some Textareas / Labels these can be anywhere
I have a program which needs installing on windows 64 boxes. Most of the
I have a program which only needs a NotifyIcon to work as intended. So
I have an AppleScript program which creates XML tags and elements within an Adobe
I have a program in which I've lost the C++ source code. Are there
I have a program in which the user adds multiple objects to a scene.
I have an MPI program which compiles and runs, but I would like to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.