Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4097500
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T20:10:53+00:00 2026-05-20T20:10:53+00:00

I have a repository including many subdirectories. I know for a fact that I

  • 0

I have a repository including many subdirectories. I know for a fact that I won’t make changes to some of them. Is there a way to tell ‘git status’ and other operations which scan the whole filesystem to not bother with these directories, thus speeding up those operations?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T20:10:54+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 8:10 pm

    I assume that by “[they] are part of the repository” (in your question’s title) that you mean the subdirectories you want to skip actually contain tracked files and that you want to avoid git status checking on the status of even those tracked files.

    By default, git status will check all the tracked paths. It does not have any options for skipping a preset list of paths, but it does take pathspec arguments that can be used to specify the paths it should check (implicitly, the other paths will be skipped).

    To directly use the available available functionality, you have to turn the problem around: How do I show the status only certain files and directories?

    The answer is that you just list them on the command line. For example, if we only want to know about src, doc (both probably directories) and Makefile:

    git status src doc Makefile
    

    Typing that every time would be cumbersome, so you will likely want to use a shell script and/or a Git alias.

    However, this only works well if you can define the set of paths you are interested in without saying something like “everything except X, Y, and Z”. Git does not include support for “everything except …” (yet1), so you will have to rely on something else to expand the list and give it to git status. Some shells have features that can help.

    Example: Process all the entries in the current directory (including “dot” files/directories) as long as they do not match .V, .W (i.e. patterns that start with a dot), X, or Y:

    • zsh with the EXTENDED_GLOB option enabled (setopt EXTENDED_GLOB),

      git status ^(.V|.W|X|Y)(D)
      

      You can leave off the (D) if you also have GLOB_DOTS enabled.

    • bash with the dotglob and extglob options enabled (shopt -s extglob dotglob):

      git status !(.V|.W|X|Y)
      
    • ksh (the pattern for “dot” names is a bit odd due to emulating GLOB_DOTS):

      git status .!(|.|V|W) !(X|Y)
      

    And again, you will probably want to wrap these up in a script (or Git alias) instead of typing them in directly.


    1
    There has been some discussion on the Git mailing about adding support for “negative” pathspecs (“everything except …”) that could let you do this without help from the shell, but there is no firm design or public code yet.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have looked over the Repository pattern and I recognized some ideas that I
I have a git repository - including different tech. Android and iPhone. The folder
I have a repository on my PC. Now I want to move some project
I have a repository class that inherits from a generic implementation: public namespace RepositoryImplementation
I was wondering if there is a better way to have a point to
I have a self-referencing many-to-many relationship between users and managers that looks like this:
I have a VS 2008 solutions that includes a number of projects including a
I have a Git repository including a Git repository. repo1/ .git/ files repo2/ .git/
I have my company dependencies (including non-FOSS third party stuff) in a Nexus repository,
We have an internal web application that acts as a repository to which users

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.