Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 260551
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:21:27+00:00 2026-05-11T22:21:27+00:00

I have a Show table, and I would like to have a derived type

  • 0

I have a Show table, and I would like to have a derived type called ActiveShow which only returns shows in the future

Show.ShowDateTime > DateTime.Now

Is there a way that I can achieve this using the designer or some other way so that creating an instance of ActiveShow will always adhere to the date condition?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:21:28+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:21 pm

    Absolutely you could do this using a DefiningQuery (which is essentially a TSQL view) in the SSDL.

    But I don’t recommend it.

    The problem is type memberships would be transient, when it should be permanent, or at the very least require you to explicitly change it.

    I.e. you could end up in a situation where at one point something is an ActiveShow (and loaded in memory) but if you do a subsequent query you might attempt to load the same object as a Show. In this situation what would happen to identity resolution is anyone’s guess.

    This will more than likely resort in some very nasty unexpected side-effects.

    As an alternative perhaps an extra Property in your Context added in a partial class:

    i.e.

    public partial class MyContext
    {
        public ObjectQuery<Show> ActiveShows
        {
           get{
               return this.Shows.Where(s => ShowDateTime > DateTime.Now) 
                      as ObjectQuery<Show>;
           }
        }
    }
    

    This probably gives you most of the benefits without most of the risks.

    Hope this helps

    Alex

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a show hide table rows feature but would now like to change
i have a table called horse, i would like to create a form to
i have a table called horse, i would like to create a form to
I have a query which is meant to show me any rows in table
When using CDT I would like to have std::string show up in the 'variable'
I have a table and would like to give an option of whether you
I have a really long 3 column table. I would like to <table> <tr><td>Column1</td><td>Column2</td></tr>
I would like to show all the usernames who have interacted with a bug
I have a table called order which contains columns id , user_id , price
I have the classical table with expandable and collapsible records that if expanded show

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.