Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7591979
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T20:47:23+00:00 2026-05-30T20:47:23+00:00

I have a singleton, typical design with a static ‘mInstance’ to hold the global

  • 0

I have a singleton, typical design with a static ‘mInstance’ to hold the global state. I notice that sometimes, while switching between activities, the mInstance variable becomes null and requires to be re-instantiated, causing all data to go empty.

Is this expected or am I doing something wrong? Is there really a chance that the static variables of a singleton would be nullified in such a scenario? I seriously doubt it and would like to hear some opinions.

Code is pasted:

public class RuleManager extends ArrayAdapter<Rule>
{
  private static RuleManager mInstance;
  private final Context context;
  public RuleManager(Context context, List<Rule> r)
  {
    super(context,R.layout.main_menu_options_list_item);
    if(r==null)r=new ArrayList<Rule>();
    this.context=context;
  }

  public static RuleManager getInstance(Context context,List<Rule> r) 
  {
      if (mInstance == null)
          mInstance = new RuleManager(context, r);
      return mInstance;
  }   
}

I just learned that storing Context like this would never let it being Garbage Collected and hence may cause a big leak.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T20:47:24+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 8:47 pm

    You need to make your constructor private. I guess you may be calling a new on the constructor. Also make your getInstance synchronized.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a singleton that uses the static readonly T Instance = new T();
I have a Singleton that is accessed in my class via a static property
I have a singleton class for global access to config information. This singleton class
I have a singleton object that use another object (not singleton), to require some
Okay, newbie multi-threading question: I have a Singleton class. The class has a Static
I have a C# singleton class that multiple classes use. Is access through Instance
I have created objects that are interfaces to a web service. One typical object
I have a singleton instance that is referenced throughout the project which works like
I have a singleton class, whose instance get initialized at global scope within the
I want to have singleton class that its object is not statically created. having

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.