Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 876251
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T11:24:14+00:00 2026-05-15T11:24:14+00:00

I have a std::vector< tr1::shared_ptr<mapObject> > that I’m trying build from data contained in

  • 0

I have a std::vector< tr1::shared_ptr<mapObject> > that I’m trying build from data contained in a compressed file. Here’s the function I’m attempting to do that with:

    using std::tr1::shared_ptr;

    template<typename T>
    void loadSharedPtrVector(std::vector< shared_ptr<T> >& vect, TCODZip& zip)
    // the TCODZip is the compression buffer I'm loading the data from.  It's
    // working correctly and isn't really part of this problem.
    {
        vect.clear();

        // load the size of the saved vector
        int numT = zip.getInt();

        // load the saved vector            
        for(int i=0; i<numT; ++i)
        {
            int type = zip.getInt();
            shared_ptr<T> Tptr(new T);
            T newT = T::loadType(type, zip);                
            Tptr.reset(&newT);
            std::cerr << "load: " << Tptr->getPosition() << std::endl; // outputs correct values
            vect.push_back(Tptr);
        }
        for(int i=0; i<numT; ++i)
        {
            // outputs the last value pushed onto vect
            std::cerr << "loadDone: " << vect[i]->getPosition() << std::endl;
        }
    }

The above function is called by this bit of code here:

        typedef std::tr1::shared_ptr<mapObject> featurePtr;

        // 'features' is a std::vector<featurePtr>, 'zip' is a TCODZip previously declared
        utility::loadSharedPtrVector<mapObject>(features, zip);

        vector<featurePtr>::const_iterator fit;
        for(fit=features.begin(); fit<features.end(); ++fit) 
        {
            // outputs mostly garbage
            cerr << "afterCall: " << (*fit)->getPosition() << endl;
        }

When this is run, the cerr statements give this output (each set of output has ~50 lines, so I cut out most for brevity):

load: (5,40)
load: (5,45)
load: (5,58)
(etc.  all 'load' lines are correct output)
load: (87,68)
load: (11,5)
loadDone: (11,5)
loadDone: (11,5)
loadDone: (11,5)
loadDone: (11,5)
loadDone: (11,5)
loadDone: (11,5)
(etc. all 'loadDone' lines are the same)
afterCall: (11,5)
afterCall: (10,1)
afterCall: (10,1)
afterCall: (10,1)
afterCall: (10,1)
afterCall: (10,1)
afterCall: (10,1)
(etc. all 'afterCall' lines are the same except for the first)

I apparently have some misconceptions about how shared_ptrs work. I realized that I’m pushing copies of Tptr into vect, and that’s why all of its indices are the same, although I thought that declaring a new shared_ptr in the loop would make a separate pointer from the other ones already in vect, but I guess not.

I have no idea why the ‘afterCall’ set of output is different from the ‘loadDone’ set (except for that first value). In addition to (10,1) it has also output (2274756,134747232) and (134747232, 16), although it outputs (10,1) more than any other.

I suspect that my problem boils down to my misuse of shared_ptr. Can anyone tell me exactly how I’m misusing it? The tutorials I find online haven’t been very helpful in this regard.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T11:24:15+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:24 am

    The problem is here:

         T newT = T::loadType(type, zip);
         Tptr.reset(&newT);
    

    You give shared_ptr pointer to stack memory, which is reclaimed at function return and is no longer valid. Allocate that from the heap:

    shared_ptr<T> Tptr( new T( T::loadType( type, zip )));
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 497k
  • Answers 497k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Ah, don't worry, found the answer. When you go to… May 16, 2026 at 11:50 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would describe what you are looking to do as… May 16, 2026 at 11:50 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is handled by __doPostBack javascript function which sets __EVENTTARGET… May 16, 2026 at 11:50 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I have some data structures: all_unordered_m is a big vector containing all the strings
Suppose I have a std::vector<Obj *> objs (for performance reasons I have pointers not
Simple question; right now I have something like this: typedef void(*MyFunctionPointer)(int); typedef std::vector <
I have this bit of code: cerr << client->inventory.getMisc().front()->getName() << endl; vector<itemPtr>::iterator it; it
I have the following code #include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <functional> int
This is a follow-up to my question from yesterday . I have Scott Meyers'
I was wandering how it's possible to reverese string s that are contained in
#include <vector> #include <functional> #include <algorithm> using namespace std; struct Foo { int i;
I have the following code fragment #include <iostream> #include <ostream> #include <vector> using namespace
I have written some sample program and DLL to learn the concept of DLL

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.