Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 202301
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:16:40+00:00 2026-05-11T17:16:40+00:00

I have a thread that appends rows to self.output and a loop that runs

  • 0

I have a thread that appends rows to self.output and a loop that runs until self.done is True (or the max execution time is reached).

Is there a more efficient way to do this other than using a while loop that constantly checks to see if it’s done. The while loop causes the CPU to spike to 100% while it’s running..

time.clock()
while True:

    if len(self.output):
        yield self.output.pop(0)

    elif self.done or 15 < time.clock():
        if 15 < time.clock():
            yield "Maximum Execution Time Exceeded %s seconds" % time.clock()
        break
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:16:40+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:16 pm

    Are your threads appending to self.output here, with your main task consuming them? If so, this is a tailor-made job for Queue.Queue. Your code should become something like:

    import Queue
    
    # Initialise queue as:
    queue = Queue.Queue()
    Finished = object()   # Unique marker the producer will put in the queue when finished
    
    # Consumer:
    try:
        while True:
            next_item = self.queue.get(timeout=15)
            if next_item is Finished: break
            yield next_item
    
    except Queue.Empty:
        print "Timeout exceeded"
    

    Your producer threads add items to the queue with queue.put(item)

    [Edit] The original code has a race issue when checking self.done (for example multiple items may be appended to the queue before the flag is set, causing the code to bail out at the first one). Updated with a suggestion from ΤΖΩΤΖΙΟΥ – the producer thread should instead append a special token (Finished) to the queue to indicate it is complete.

    Note: If you have multiple producer threads, you’ll need a more general approach to detecting when they’re all finished. You could accomplish this with the same strategy – each thread a Finished marker and the consumer terminates when it sees num_threads markers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a thread that, when its function exits its loop (the exit is
I have one thread that writes results into a Queue. In another thread (GUI),
I have a thread that needs to be executed every 10 seconds. This thread
In my Silverlight project I have a thread that fires every x milliseconds. In
In my C# program, I have a thread that represents a running test, which
I have a worker thread that is listening to a TCP socket for incoming
I've seen a number of examples that have a thread procedure that looks like
We have a Windows Service written in C#. The service spawns a thread that
I have an object that starts a thread, opens a file, and waits for
I have data that needs to be executed on a certain background thread. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.