Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 97253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T23:58:11+00:00 2026-05-10T23:58:11+00:00

I have a thread that needs to be executed every 10 seconds. This thread

  • 0

I have a thread that needs to be executed every 10 seconds. This thread contains several calls (12 – 15) to a database on another server. Additionally, it also accesses around 3 files. Consequently, there will be quite a lot of IO and network overhead.

What is the best strategy to perform the above?

One way would be to use the sleep method along with a while loop, but that would be a bad design.

Will a class similar to Timer be helpful in this case? Also, would it be better to create a couple of more threads (one for IO and one for JDBC), instead of having them run in one thread?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T23:58:11+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 11:58 pm

    I find that a ScheduledExecutorService is an excellent way to do this. It is arguably slightly more complex than a Timer, but gives more flexibility in exchange (e.g. you could choose to use a single thread or a thread pool; it takes units other than solely milliseconds).

    ScheduledExecutorService executor =     Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor();  Runnable periodicTask = new Runnable() {     public void run() {         // Invoke method(s) to do the work         doPeriodicWork();     } };  executor.scheduleAtFixedRate(periodicTask, 0, 10, TimeUnit.SECONDS); 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 70k
  • Answers 70k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer The canvas's width and height are in its offsetWidth and… May 11, 2026 at 12:52 pm
  • added an answer You need to use: String StringEscapeUtils.unescapeJava(String str) from the Apache… May 11, 2026 at 12:52 pm
  • added an answer Don't conflate Language and Run-Time. Python (the language) has many… May 11, 2026 at 12:52 pm

Related Questions

I have data that needs to be executed on a certain background thread. I
I have a Queue object that I need to ensure is thread-safe. Would it
I have a thread that, when its function exits its loop (the exit is
In my Silverlight project I have a thread that fires every x milliseconds. In
I've never been completely happy with the way exception handling works, there's a lot
Alright...I've given the site a fair search and have read over many posts about
I have a list/queue of 200 commands that I need to run in a

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.