Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6319335
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T15:47:22+00:00 2026-05-24T15:47:22+00:00

I have a thread that puts data in a buffer and multiple threads that

  • 0

I have a thread that puts data in a buffer and multiple threads that will read their portions of data from the buffer.

How can I create a synchronization mechanism to satisfy those requirements:

  1. Writer thread writes all data into buffer and lets all reader threads run at the same time (ok, i did it with Semaphore). Then waits for all of them to complete their turn. I could not use WaitForMultipleObjects since threads are not terminating but rather one round of loop is ending. Maybe an event for each reader thread and when loop ends they will signal it and Writer will use WaitForMultipleObjects to wait for all threads to finish their round of loop?
  2. Reader threads read their data, do their job for that round and somehow let Writer thread to put the next data. Please note that, Writer should start its next round of loop when all of the threads finish their turn.

How to implement such mechanism? as i said, only thing i can think of seems to be:

Writer:

for (;;) 
{
    PutDataIntoBuffer();
    for (i = 0; i < threadCount; ++i)
    {
        ResetEvent(threadEvents[i]); //so that all events will be nonsignaled
    }
    ReleaseSemaphore(sem, threadCount, NULL);
    WaitForMultipleObjects(threadCount, threadEvents, TRUE, INFINITE);
}

Readers:

for (;;)
{
    WaitForSingleObject(sem, INFINITE);
    DoWhateverToBeDoneWithData();
    SetEvent(threadEvents[myThreadIndex]); //writer, wait for me too!
}

What are better ways of doing this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T15:47:23+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 3:47 pm

    You should use a Readers-writer lock.

    In Windows there is a Slim Reader/Writer lock which I recommend that you have a look at.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a thread that needs to write data from an in-memory buffer to
I have data that needs to be executed on a certain background thread. I
I have a simple thread that runs an infinite loop. Eventually, the loop will
I have one thread that writes results into a Queue. In another thread (GUI),
I have a thread that, when its function exits its loop (the exit is
I have a thread that needs to be executed every 10 seconds. This thread
In my Silverlight project I have a thread that fires every x milliseconds. In
In my C# program, I have a thread that represents a running test, which
I have a worker thread that is listening to a TCP socket for incoming
I've seen a number of examples that have a thread procedure that looks like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.