Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 81757
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:30:36+00:00 2026-05-10T21:30:36+00:00

I have a three-step process that is entirely reliant upon JavaScript and Ajax to

  • 0

I have a three-step process that is entirely reliant upon JavaScript and Ajax to load data and animate the process from one step to the next. To further complicate matters, the transition (forward and backward) between steps is animated :-(. As user’s progress through the process anchor’s appear showing the current step and previous steps. If they click on a previous step, then it takes them back to the previous step.

Right now, the entire process (forward and backward) works correctly, if you begin at step 1, but if you jump straight to step 3 then the anchors for step 1 and step 2 also perform the same action as step 3.

This is the portion of the code that loops through all of the steps up to the current step that the user would be on and displays each anchor in turn and assigns the appropriate function to the click event:

for (var i = 0; i < profile.current + 1; i++) {     if ($('step_anchor_' + i).innerHTML.empty()) {         var action = profile.steps[i].action;         var dao_id = profile.steps[i].dao_id;          $('step_anchor_' + i).innerHTML = profile.steps[i].anchor;         $('step_anchor_' + i).observe('click', function(){             pm.loadData(action, dao_id, true);         });          Effect.Appear('step_anchor_' + i, {             duration: 1,             delay: (down_delay++)         });     } } 

I know that problem lies in the way that the action and dao_id parameters are being passed in. I’ve also tried passing profile.steps[i].action and profile.steps[i].dao_id but in that case both profile and i or at least i are out scope.

How do I make it so that I can assign the parameters for action and dao_id correctly for each step? (If it makes any difference we are using Prototype and Scriptaculous)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:30:36+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:30 pm

    Your closure scope chain is causing your problems. By declaring the handler function inline, you’ve created a closure. Obviously you did this to take advantage of the loop.

    However, since you have created a closure, you’re playing by closure scoping rules. Those rules state that the local variables within the parent function remain active and available as long as the closure exists.

    You are trying to pass and then use ‘action’ and ‘dao_id’ to your closure, but you are passing references here, not values. So when your closures (handlers) are called they use the value that the reference was last assigned. In your case, the Step 3 handler.

    Closure scoping rules are confusing enough, but you may also be confused by the fact that ‘action’ and ‘dao_id’ are still alive even though the loop block has finished executing. Well, in JavaScript there is no such thing as block scope. Once you declare a variable it is available until the end of the function or until is it deleted. Whichever comes first.

    All that said, you need to break the scope chain. Here are two ways to do that:

    Try this:

    for (var i = 0; i < profile.current + 1; i++) {     if ($('step_anchor_' + i).innerHTML.empty()) {         var action = profile.steps[i].action;         var dao_id = profile.steps[i].dao_id;          $('step_anchor_' + i).innerHTML = profile.steps[i].anchor;         $('step_anchor_' + i).observe('click', function(a, b){                 return function(){pm.loadData(a, b, true)};         }(action, dao_id));          Effect.Appear('step_anchor_' + i, {                 duration: 1,                 delay: (down_delay++)         });     } } 

    Or this:

    function createHandler(action, dao_id) {     return function(){pm.loadData(action, dao_id, true);}; }   /* snip - inside some other function */ for (var i = 0; i < profile.current + 1; i++) {     if ($('step_anchor_' + i).innerHTML.empty()) {         var action = profile.steps[i].action;         var dao_id = profile.steps[i].dao_id;          $('step_anchor_' + i).innerHTML = profile.steps[i].anchor;         $('step_anchor_' + i).observe('click', createHandler(action, dao_id));         Effect.Appear('step_anchor_' + i, {                 duration: 1,                 delay: (down_delay++)         });     } } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have three tables: page, attachment, page-attachment I have data like this: page ID
I have three tables tag , page , pagetag With the data below page
I have three unordered lists that have been created as Scriptaculous Sortables so that
I have three models: class ReleaseItem < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :pack_release_items has_one :pack, :through =>
I have three (C++) classes: Player, Hand, and Card. Player has a member, hand,
I have three divs : <div id=login /> <div id=content /> <div id=menu />
I have three TextBox controls on the page <asp:TextBox ID=TextBox1 runat=server AutoPostBack=True OnTextChanged=TextBox_TextChanged TabIndex=1>
I have three tables in the many-to-many format. I.e, table A, B, and AB
I have three values I need to align in a dropdown box. How can

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.