Home/ Questions/Q 8619715
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-12T06:24:25+00:00

I have a Wi-Fi capture ( .pcap ) that I’m analysing and have run

  • 0

I have a Wi-Fi capture (.pcap) that I’m analysing and have run across what appear to me to be inconsistencies between the 802.11 spec and Wireshark’s interpretation of the data. Specifically what I’m trying to pull apart is the 2-byte 802.11 Frame Control field.

Taken from http://www4.ncsu.edu/~aliu3/802.bmp, the format of the Frame Control field’s subfields are as follows:

Frame control subfields.

And below is a Wireshark screen cap of the packet that has me confused:

Confusing Frame Control in Wireshark

So as per the Wireshark screenshot, the flags portion (last 8 bits) of the Frame Control field is 0x22, which is fine. How the Version/Type/Subtype being 0x08 matches up with Wireshark’s description of the frame is what has me confused.

0x08 = 0000 1000b, which I thought would translate to Version = 00, Type = 00 (which I thought meant management not data frame) and Subtype = 1000 (which I thought would be a beacon frame). So I would expect this frame to be a management frame and more specifically, a beacon frame. Wireshark however reports it as a Data frame. The second thing that is confusing me is where Wireshark is even pulling 0x20 from in the line Type/Subtype: Data (0x20).

Can anyone clarify my interpretation of the 802.11 spec/Wireshark capture for me and why the two aren’t consistent?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    The data frame in you example is 0x08 because of the layout of that byte of the frame control (FC). 0x08 = 00001000
    – The first 4 bits (0000) are the subtype. 0000 is the subtype of this frame
    – The next 2 bits (10) is the type, which is 2 decimal and thus a data type frame
    – The last 2 bits (00) are the version, which is 0

    The table below translates the hex value of the subtype-type-version byte of the FC for several frame types. A compare of the QoS data to the normal data frame might really help get this down pat. Mind you the table might have an error or two, as I just whipped it up.

    You are right that 1000 is a beacon frame, you just were looking at the wrong bits.

    enter image description here

    You have a radiotap header, you can get the dec representation of the type like so from the pcap API:

    int type = pkt_data[20] >> 2;
    • 0