Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 612583
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:54:34+00:00 2026-05-13T17:54:34+00:00

I have a wrapper class for an object. I want it to apply all

  • 0

I have a wrapper class for an object. I want it to apply all operations applied to it on the wrapped object, e.g wrapper+=a would yield the same result as wrapped+=a, for instance. I want to apply this for all operators. Any simple way to override all operators without overriding each one explicitly?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:54:34+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:54 pm

    No, sorry. Though you could write an interface (probably as a decorator or base class) that makes this easy, if you need to do it more than once. Or use one provided already. (Guess I was 40s too late.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class 'Database' that works as a wrapper for ADO.net. For instance,
I have wrapped Log4net in a static wrapper and want to log loggingEvent.LocationInformation.MethodName loggingEvent.LocationInformation.ClassName
I have been working on a wrapper for a COM object that can only
I have an OLE COM object that trying to write a wrapper for, I
I have a wrapper around a C++ function call which I call from C#
I have a list wrapper that maintains two Tstringlists and a TClassList I need
I have some written a number of unit tests that test a wrapper around
I have some code in C# which has a com wrapper. This com wrapper
I have a collection of unmanaged dlls with a C# wrapper around them that
I have a .NET component exposed as a CCW (Com Callable Wrapper) and being

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.