Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6213303
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T06:40:21+00:00 2026-05-24T06:40:21+00:00

I have: active = Node.objects.filter(status = ‘a’) potential = Node.objects.filter(status = ‘p’) hotspot =

  • 0

I have:

active = Node.objects.filter(status = 'a')
potential = Node.objects.filter(status = 'p')
hotspot = Node.objects.filter(status = 'h')

I’m wondering: is it’s possible to do it in a better way?

EDIT: maybe i didn’t explain myself very well. I need to have 3 lists with the 3 different status. If I do just 1 query then I will have to loop over the list to make 3 new lists, but if the list if very long wouldn’t that be inefficient?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T06:40:22+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 6:40 am

    Even better, use in:

    Node.objects.filter(status__in=['a', 'p', 'h'])
    

    Edit after comment Don’t know why that would be inefficient. Perhaps one improvement would be to add .order_by('status') so you get an ordered queryset, then split when you iterate through. Likely to be a micro-optimization though.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to determine the number of users that have active sessions
I have a tree of active record objects, something like: class Part < ActiveRecord::Base
For example, I have node/31. And I want drupal to set menu active item
I have an active directory search function: Function GetAdInfo(ByVal ADDN As String, ByVal ADCommonName
I have a menu within a page, I have an active class applied to
I have been doing active development in C# for several years now. I primarily
I have a standard active record model with an attributes that is required: class
I have an other active question HERE regarding some hopeless memory issues that possibly
I'm tinkering with CodeIgniter and have come across Active Records for the first time.
Greetings, I would like to ask if creating Singleton to have only one active

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.