Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 101359
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T00:45:21+00:00 2026-05-11T00:45:21+00:00

I have an assortment of database objects (tables, functions, views, stored procedures) each scripted

  • 0

I have an assortment of database objects (tables, functions, views, stored procedures) each scripted into its own file (constraints are in the same file as the table they alter) that I’d like to be able execute in an arbitrary order. Is this possible in SQL Server 2005?

Some objects as an example:
Table A (references Table B)
Table B (references Function A)
Function A (references View A)
View A (references Table C)

Must be run in the following order:
Table C
View A
Function A
Table B
Table A

If the scripts are run out of order, errors about the missing objects are thrown.

The reason I ask is that in a project I’m working on we maintain each database object in its own file (for source control purposes), and then maintain a master script that creates each database object in the correct order. This requires the master script to be manually edited any time an object is added to the schema. I’d like to be able to just execute each script as it is found in the file system.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T00:45:21+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:45 am

    In my experience the most problematic issue is with views, which can reference recursively. I once wrote a utility to iterate through the scripts until the errors were all resolved. Which only works when you’re loading everything. Order was important – I think I did UDTs, tables, FKs, views (iteratively), SPs and UDFs (iteratively until we decided that SPs calling SPs was a bad idea, and UDFs are generally a bad idea.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 96k
  • Answers 96k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Define JS function: function validate(){ //perform some validation return $("#myTextbox").val()=="";… May 11, 2026 at 7:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The compiler will turn index[array] into *(index + array) With… May 11, 2026 at 7:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Absolutely no advantages in this case whatsoever. Except if you… May 11, 2026 at 7:12 pm

Related Questions

I have recently started moving into the world of Linux development. I wanted to
I have a 3-tier .NET service app, which follows the standard approach: Frontend ->
I have an absolutely positioned div containing several children, one of which is a
I have an array in Perl: my @my_array = (one,two,three,two,three); How do I remove

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.