Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8369199
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T13:35:13+00:00 2026-06-09T13:35:13+00:00

I have an expensive function call that gets called once per loop, but I

  • 0

I have an expensive function call that gets called once per loop, but I would like to set the return value of that to be a temporary variable that can be used directly within the loop.

This works by setting {{ val=fn(...) }}, but it also prints to the screen. Is it possible to do this without printing the value?

I’ve tried using one set of curly braces {} but it doesn’t work.

Any ideas on how to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T13:35:14+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 1:35 pm

    Have you looked into “filters” or possibly doing the work in your JS code instead of the view?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a computationally expensive task in perl, and would like to inform the
I have heard that DateTime.Now is very expensive call (from here ) Is GETDATE()
I have an array of tags per item like so: item1 = ['new', 'expensive']
I have an expensive function that takes and returns a small amount of data
I have a fairly expensive server call that I need to cache for 30
As a toy example, suppose that we have a function called 'my_func' (the code
I have an iterative function, phi, that calls itself many times to return the
I have a very expensive query which gets executed from php and it can
I have some python code that currently performs expensive computation by performing the computation
I have a object with properties that are expensive to compute, so they are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.