Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6736099
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T11:05:25+00:00 2026-05-26T11:05:25+00:00

I have an object in a LinkedHashSet that implements equals , hashCode and compareTo

  • 0

I have an object in a LinkedHashSet that implements equals, hashCode and compareTo (in a superclass) but when I try to remove that exact object from the set set.remove(obj) the remove method returns false and the object remains in the set. Is the implementation of LinkedHashSet supposed to call the equals() method of its objects? Because it doesn’t. Could this be a java bug? I’m running 1.6.0_25.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T11:05:26+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:05 am

    My guess would be that your object’s hashCode() implementation is returning a different value than when you added the object to the set.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an object that implements IDisposable that is registered with the Windsor Container
I have a domain object that has a Map: private Map<AutoHandlingSlotKey, LinkedHashSet<AutoFunction>> autoHandling; When
I have object that implements MKReverseGeocoder. I'm running it inside of separate thread and
Application use NHibernate. I Have object A that contains set of objects B. I
Is it possible to set option that for example: I have object Object1 After
I have two tables: object that has object_id column and avalues that have object_id
I think I read somewhere that some modules only have object oriented interfaces (
I have an object that is mapped to a cookie as a serialized base-64
I have an object in a multi-threaded environment that maintains a collection of information,
I have object called Foo. Right now it implements IFoo which has a lot

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.