Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6176235
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T00:03:54+00:00 2026-05-24T00:03:54+00:00

I have code such as: public void MethodA() { MyManualResetEvent.Reset(); } public void MethodB()

  • 0

I have code such as:

public void MethodA()
{
    MyManualResetEvent.Reset();
}

public void MethodB()
{
    MyManualResetEvent.Set();
}

This works when using MyManualResetEvent.WaitOne() to stop a thread if another thread has called MethodA but not MethodB.

What i want to do now is be able to call MethodA twice, with another thread only continuing if MethodB is called twice, rather than just once.

I’m hoping there’s something in the System.Threading namespace i don’t know about.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T00:03:54+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 12:03 am

    Assuming you don’t need to stop a concurrently-executing BlockedMethod the instant MethodA is called, this is probably most easily solved with the standard Monitor class. MethodA and MethodB share a counter which records how many times MethodA has been called without a corresponding call to MethodB. The BlockedMethod method only proceeds if that count is 0; if not, it waits for MethodB to signal it that it’s time to proceed.

    object mylock = new object();
    int count = 0;
    
    public void MethodA()
    {
        // record that MethodA is executing
        lock (mylock)
            count++;
    
        // other code...
    }
    
    public void MethodB()
    {
        // other code...
    
        lock (mylock)
        {
            // MethodB has now finished running
            count--;
    
            // wake up other thread because it may now be allowed to run
            Monitor.Pulse(mylock);
        }
    }
    
    public void BlockedMethod()
    {
        // wait until the number of calls to A and B is equal (i.e., count is 0)
        lock (mylock)
        {
            while (count != 0)
                 Monitor.Wait(mylock);
        }
    
        // calls to A and B are balanced, proceed...
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have such piece of code: namespace NetHacking { interface IPlugin { void Execute(PluginData
I have, for example, such class: class Base { public: void SomeFunc() { std::cout
I have the following piece of code which replaces template markers such as %POST_TITLE%
I have code similar to this filtering entries in an Array of Objects: var
I have code like this: var newMsg = new Msg { Var1 = var1,
I have code like this: template <typename T, typename U> struct MyStruct { T
I have code like this to move the player in my game left, right,
I have code that looks like the following, which works fine for displaying the
I have to use context in many places of my code such as database
I Have written such a code below and I will pass two lists to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.