Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6577715
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T15:40:26+00:00 2026-05-25T15:40:26+00:00

I have concrete class that I want to mock. There are several annotated methods

  • 0

I have concrete class that I want to mock. There are several annotated methods with annotations. I want to create class mock but I need to preserve that annotations.

I tried easymock. It subclasses my class without problems, but does not preserve annotations.

I would like to preserve annotations in easymock. If that is impossible are there any other mocking solution?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T15:40:27+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 3:40 pm

    I prefer mockito which uses a different paradigm for mocking out classes. You don’t have to subclass everything like you do with easymock.

    http://code.google.com/p/mockito/

    The javadoc itself has a ton of information about how to utilize the library

    http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html#2

    Her is a short example from their documentation.

    //You can mock concrete classes, not only interfaces
    LinkedList mockedList = mock(LinkedList.class);
    
    //stubbing
    when(mockedList.get(0)).thenReturn("first");
    when(mockedList.get(1)).thenThrow(new RuntimeException());
    
    //following prints "first"
    System.out.println(mockedList.get(0));
    
    //following throws runtime exception
    System.out.println(mockedList.get(1));
    
    //following prints "null" because get(999) was not stubbed
    System.out.println(mockedList.get(999));
    
    //Although it is possible to verify a stubbed invocation, 
    //usually it's just redundant
    //If your code cares what get(0) returns then something else 
    //breaks (often before even verify() gets executed).
    //If your code doesn't care what get(0) returns then it should 
    not be stubbed. Not    convinced? See here.
    verify(mockedList).get(0);
    

    So with this library you setup your tests and stub out the methods that you are interested in testing.

    Hope you found this useful.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a concrete class A that extends BaseA and implements InterfaceA. I want
I have a concrete class that contains a collection of another concrete class. I
I have a link error where the linker complains that my concrete class's destructor
I currently have 2 concrete methods in 2 abstract classes. One class contains the
if there is an interface and a class that implements it and you want
I have one main interface and an abstract class implementing all derivable methods (that
I have a class that I want to have access to my IOC container
Suppose I have a strongly typed caching interface that I want to mock. It
Lets say I have a concrete class Class1 and I am creating an anonymous
Let's say we have a concrete class Apple . (Apple objects can be instantiated.)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.