Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3484674
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T10:48:56+00:00 2026-05-18T10:48:56+00:00

I have critical section in my application which contains a lot of code: which

  • 0

I have critical section in my application which contains a lot of code:
which is better way to locking access in threadMethod:

A) lock all block:

private object locker = new object();

private void threadMethod()
{
   while(true)
   {
      lock(locker)
      {
         // do work - a lot of code here
      }
      Thread.Sleep(2000);
   }
}

B) Use additional locked access member canWork:

 private static object locker = new object();
 private bool canWork;
 private bool CanWork
 { 
     get { lock(locker) { return this.canWork; } }
     set { lock(locker) { this.canWork = value; } } 
 }

  private void threadMethod()
  {
     while(true)
     {
        if(CanWork)
        {
           // do work - a lot of code here
        }
        Thread.Sleep(2000);
     }
  }

and somewhere in code

CanWork = false;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T10:48:56+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 10:48 am

    Neither is particularly good.

    • The first has the disadvantage that you hold the lock for a long time.
    • The second has the disadvantage that the state can change after you check it.

    Instead try to pass immutable arguments to your method (for example a copy of the data). You will probably still need to lock for constructing the arguments and for collecting the results but this is hopefully a much shorter period of time.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a slapd LDAP server which is critical to my application. I want
I'm currently working on a performance critical application which incorporates legacy c code (a
I have used IPC in Win32 code a while ago - critical sections, events,
I have certain critical bash scripts that are invoked by code I don't control,
I have a speed critical multithreaded program which involves data in a tree structure.
I have a piece of performance critical code written with pointers and dynamic memory.
i have two methods -(void) a { @synchronized(self) { // critical section 1 }
Suppose you have an object which can be accesed by many threads. A critical
I have this piece of code in my application. I suspect that it is
I am using a mutex for the critical section. I have a design constraint

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.