Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6895943
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T06:58:23+00:00 2026-05-27T06:58:23+00:00

I have following code that I’m trying to test using NUnit and Rhino mocks.

  • 0

I have following code that I’m trying to test using NUnit and Rhino mocks.

void _tracker_IndexChanged(object sender, IndexTrackerChangedEventArgs e)
{
    //  _context is initialised as 
    //  SynchronizationContext _context = SynchronizationContext.Current;
    // _tracker.Index is stubbed to return the value 100
    _context.Post(o => _view.SetTrackbarValue(_tracker.Index), null);
}

In testcase I have set the expectation as

_view.Expect(v => v.SetTrackbarValue(100));

and when I verify expectation, the unit test fails randomaly with message

Test(s) failed. Rhino.Mocks.Exceptions.ExpectationViolationException :
IIndexTrackerView.SetTrackbarValue(100); Expected #1, Actual #0.

I failed identify the problem here, How do I fix it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T06:58:23+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:58 am

    I usually solve problems like this by encapsulating global state with an abstract class or interface that can be instanced and mocked out. Then instead of directly accessing the global state, I inject an instance of my abstract class or interface into the code that uses it.

    This lets me mock out the global behavior, and makes it so my tests don’t depend on or exercise that unrelated behavior.

    Here’s one way you could do that.

    public interface IContext
    {
        void Post(SendOrPostCallback d, Object state);
    }
    
    public class SynchronizationContextAdapter : IContext
    {
        private SynchronizationContext _context;
    
        public SynchronizationContextAdapter(SynchronizationContext context)
        {
            _context = context;
        }
    
        public virtual void Post(SendOrPostCallback d, Object state)
        {
            _context.Post(d, state);
        }
    }
    
    public class SomeClass
    {
        public SomeClass(IContext context)
        {
            _context = context;
        }
    
        void _tracker_IndexChanged(object sender, IndexTrackerChangedEventArgs e)
        {
            _context.Post(o => _view.SetTrackbarValue(_tracker.Index), null);
        }
        // ...
    }
    

    Then you can mock or stub out IContext so you don’t have to worry about threading, and can use a simple implementation that just executes the delegate.

    If I wrote unit tests to mock this out, I’d also write higher level “integration” tests that didn’t mock it out, but had less granular verifications.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following code that I need to add an additonal object to
I have the following code that creates a serverside object of the xmlhttp class.
I have the following code that loads a user's Active Directory DirectoryEntry object from
I have the following code that sends a message using the mail() function. Everything
I have the following code that applies a XSLT style Test.Xml.xslTransform = function(xml, xsl)
I have the following code that works fine i am trying to get the
I have the following code that fails to display object images. But displays normal
I have the following code that I managed to come up with: private void
I have the following code that creates an object in JavaScript. It uses prototype
I have the following code that saves a map into shared memory using boost

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.