Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3940320
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T00:24:16+00:00 2026-05-20T00:24:16+00:00

I have read many posts about this now but I do not still understand

  • 0

I have read many posts about this now but I do not still understand it. I would appriciate an answer rather than a link because I probably already have read it.

if (self = [super init]) {

}

return self;

When I am calling the [super init] I know I am calling the method on “self”(the objects address) but I am starting the “method-search” in the superclass. When this returns I assign the object type id to self…This is where I am getting lost.

Am I assigning “self” as an initialized object up to the point of the superclass to self..?

I understand that I am doing this check to stop the initializing if the superclass implementation of the initializer returns nil however I dont understand what I am assinging to self….I thought self was an address to the current object in memory.

Thanks in advance

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T00:24:17+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 12:24 am

    The assignment has always seemed a bit hacky to me. Its main point is that the superclass might want to return some other instance than the one that was initially allocated:

    id foo = [[Foo alloc] init];
    
    @interface Foo : SuperFoo {…}
    @implementation Foo
    
    - (id) init
    {
        self = [super init];
        if (!self)
            …;
        return self;
    }
    
    @interface SuperFoo : NSObject {…}
    @implementation SuperFoo
    
    - (id) init
    {
        [self release];
        return [OtherClass alloc];
    }
    

    This is crazy indeed, but the fact is that [super init] might return an object different from the previous self. See Mike Ash’s blog post, that should make things super clear.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Alright...I've given the site a fair search and have read over many posts about
I have read this post about how to test private methods. I usually do
I have read the documentation on this and I think I understand. An AutoResetEvent
OK I have read many posts regarding Dual Licensing using MIT and GPL licenses.
I just read this post about why new-line warnings exist, but to be honest
I have read about partial methods in the latest C# language specification , so
I know this is somewhat of a dead horse, but I'm not finding a
I fear this has been beaten to death, but I'm still struggling with the
I have read through several reviews on Amazon and some books seem outdated. I
I have read a lot that LISP can redefine syntax on the fly, presumably

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.