Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 168651
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T12:29:28+00:00 2026-05-11T12:29:28+00:00

I have several entity classes that I use for parsing fixed width text files

  • 0

I have several entity classes that I use for parsing fixed width text files as well as utilizing Linq to SQL. I use these classes to parse data from said text files, and compare to data in the database.

One of these entities has a lot of properties, and I don’t want to waste time setting each individual property on the Linq result object.

Is there a way to tell Linq ‘Here’s my object, use this to update the record’? Here’s code I’m working on:

 if (partialContent.MonthlyAddChange == 'A')    {        bookContentTable.InsertOnSubmit(partialContent);    }    else if (partialContent.MonthlyAddChange == 'C')    {        var query = from bookContent in bookContentTable                    where bookContent.EAN == partialContent.EAN                    select bookContent;         if (query != null)        {            // Do something with query.First()        }    } } 

Is it better to delete the record and do an InsertOnSubmit() in this case?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T12:29:28+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:29 pm

    I think the concept of editing a record is different from deleting and inserting a new one. Basically, I think an ORM should abstract away primary key generation and other related stuff. By deleting and inserting, you might be removing the integrity of the record (probably issuing a new primary key, making referenced entities invalid and so forth…). I suggest updating the record whenever the action you are taking is conceptually an update.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 118k
  • Answers 118k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Definitely, if you have your data as byte[], BinaryFormatter is… May 11, 2026 at 11:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Well I was able to get it to work this… May 11, 2026 at 11:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer None of the suggestion above worked. I solved it with… May 11, 2026 at 11:29 pm

Related Questions

I was just reading about Linq to SQL being discontinued. For a while I
I have an ASP.NET application that uses a layered architecture e.g. presentation layer, business
I have looked over the Repository pattern and I recognized some ideas that I
I am 80% sure I should not be asking this question because it might

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.