Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 968001
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T02:24:32+00:00 2026-05-16T02:24:32+00:00

I have some library of classes, working with my data, which is being read

  • 0

I have some library of classes, working with my data, which is being read into buffer. Is it possible somehow to avoid copying arrays again and again, passing parts of data deeper and deeper into processing methods? Well, it sounds strange, but in my particular case, there’s a special writer, which divides data into blocks and writes them individually into different locations, so it just performs System.arraycopy, gets what it needs and calls underlying writer, with that new sub array. And this happens many times. What is the best approach to refactor such code?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T02:24:32+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:24 am

    Many classes in Java accept a subset of an arrays as parameter. E.g. Writer.write(char cbuf[], int off, int len). Maybe this already suffices for your usecase.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have developed direct3D video rendering library that is used for rendering video in
I have been working on this plugin system. I thought I passed design and
I'm working with ReCaptcha, ASP.NET and Gaia Ajax . It took me some time
Hi i'm new android. i'm working through the samples and have an error when
All this might look too trivial but read it through - I have simple
This is a question I had about working with the Kohana framework, though I
I am working on an MEF project to discover usage and implementation techniques. My
Since i'm working around time complexity, i've been searching through the oracle Java class
I have a LINQ expression that gets used as a filer in a LINQ
Currently, I'm using AjaxPro Framework ( http://www.ajaxpro.info/ ) to call any methods in my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.