Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 968001
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T02:24:32+00:00 2026-05-16T02:24:32+00:00

I have some library of classes, working with my data, which is being read

  • 0

I have some library of classes, working with my data, which is being read into buffer. Is it possible somehow to avoid copying arrays again and again, passing parts of data deeper and deeper into processing methods? Well, it sounds strange, but in my particular case, there’s a special writer, which divides data into blocks and writes them individually into different locations, so it just performs System.arraycopy, gets what it needs and calls underlying writer, with that new sub array. And this happens many times. What is the best approach to refactor such code?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T02:24:32+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:24 am

    Many classes in Java accept a subset of an arrays as parameter. E.g. Writer.write(char cbuf[], int off, int len). Maybe this already suffices for your usecase.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have refactored some UIView sub-classes into a static library. However, when using Interface
Hi i'm working in a class library using C#, and i have some classes
I have a OCaml library with lots of classes I need some translator to
I am creating a Control Library project. I have some Cursor files which i
I have run into some trouble with the gd library's imagefilledpolygon() . For some
I'm working on a project where I have to grab some of the classes
I have some code shared among multiple projects in a static library. Even with
If I have have some overloaded ostream operators, defined for library local objects, is
Suppose, I have an opensource project that depends on some library, that must be
I have a failure in some inner library function in Octave. I want to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.