Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6910595
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T08:50:06+00:00 2026-05-27T08:50:06+00:00

I have the following scenario: I have abstract classes A and B , and

  • 0

I have the following scenario:

I have abstract classes A and B, and A uses B to perform some tasks. In both classes, there are some “constant” parameters (right now implemented as class attributes) to be set by concrete classes extending those abstract classes, and some of the parameters are shared (they should have the same value in a derived “suite” of classes SubA and SubB).

The problem I face here is with how namespaces are organized in Python. The ideal solution if Python had dynamic scoping would be to declare those parameters as module variables, and then when creating a new suite of extending classes I could just overwrite them in their new module. But (luckily, because for most cases that is safer and more convenient) Python does not work like that.

To put it in a more concrete context (not my actual problem, and of course not accurate nor realistic), imagine something like a nbody simulator with:

 ATTRACTION_CONSTANT = NotImplemented # could be G or a Ke for example

 class NbodyGroup(object):
     def __init__(self):
         self.bodies = []

     def step(self):
         for a in self.bodies:
             for b in self.bodies:
                 f = ATTRACTION_CONSTANT * a.var * b.var / distance(a, b)**2
                 ...

 class Body(object):
     def calculate_field_at_surface(self):
         return ATTRACTION_CONSTANT * self.var / self.r**2

Then other module could implement a PlanetarySystem(NBodyGroup) and Planet(Body) setting ATTRACTION_CONSTANT to 6.67384E-11 and other module could implement MolecularAggregate(NBodyGroup) and Particle(Body) and set ATTRACTION_CONSTANT to 8.987E9.

In brief: what are good alternatives to emulate global constants at module level that can be “overwritten” in derived modules (modules that implement the abstract classes defined in the first module)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T08:50:06+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:50 am

    How about using a mixin? You could define (based on your example) classes for PlanetarySystemConstants and MolecularAggregateConstants that hold the ATTRACTION_CONSTANT and then use class PlanetarySystem(NBodyGroup, PlanetarySystemConstants) and class MolecularAggregate(NBodyGroup, MolecularAggregateConstants) to define those classes.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have following scenario. Some people use approach 1 and some use approach 2.
Say I have the following scenario: abstract class A { abstract method1(); abstract method2();
we have the following scenario: an abstract class in dll1 a class that inherits
I have the following scenario: sealed abstract class Type(val inUse: Boolean) case class IntTy(override
I am trying to understand isolation/locks in SQL Server. I have following scenario in
I have the following scenario: in activity A, when a user clicks a button,
I have the following scenario: if(xml.Descendants(ns + Children).FirstOrDefault() != null) { XElement children =
I have the following scenario, a Customer who can have bank accounts in several
I have the following scenario :- template <typename T> class Base { public: virtual
I have the following scenario: Entities are loaded from the database. One of them

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.