Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6003997
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T01:12:01+00:00 2026-05-23T01:12:01+00:00

I have this macro: #define kPaxZoneW 105.0 I want to define a subsequent macro

  • 0

I have this macro:

#define kPaxZoneW 105.0

I want to define a subsequent macro that always needs to have the same value but for semantic reasons, needs to have a different name. Can I get away with this after the previous definition?

#define kPaxZoneAFA kPaxZoneW

This would ensure that kPaxZoneAFA will always be equal to the value of kPaxZoneW.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T01:12:02+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 1:12 am

    Yes; when you do this, any use of kPaxZoneAFA would be replaced first by kPaxZoneW then by 105.0.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

in my c++ linux application I have this macro: #define PRINT(format,arg...) printf(format,##arg) I want
I have a macro that looks like this: #define coutError if (VERBOSITY_SETTING >= VERBOSITY_ERROR)
If you have a macro like this in C: #define SLICE_VERSION 20110614 How to
I have an application that used Macro. In this macro I would like to
Possible Duplicate: Problem with Macros Hi all I have defined this macro: #define SQ(a)
I have macro like this: #define error_exit(format, ...) \ error_at_line(EXIT_FAILURE, 0, __FILE__, __LINE__, format,
Say we have a macro like this #define FOO(type,name) type name Which we could
I have this macro from someone's code: #define Q_DEF_PROTOTYPE( Type, Name ) Type (*Name)
I have this macro code, which allows me to define both a C enum
I have this gridPanel: Ext.define('BM.view.test.MacroList', { extend: 'BM.view.GridPanel', alias:'widget.macro-test-list', store: 'Tests', initComponent: function() {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.