Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8509043
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T03:19:33+00:00 2026-06-11T03:19:33+00:00

I have this piece of code (contrived from my real-life trouble) It cannot compile,

  • 0

I have this piece of code (contrived from my real-life trouble)

It cannot compile, complaining ExtendsB does not implement B::Run(A* a). However, it has no problems understanding the extension to A* Run();

class A { };

class ExtendsA : public A { };

class B
{
public:
    virtual ~B(){}  
    virtual void Run(A* a) = 0;
    virtual A* Run() = 0;
};

class ExtendsB : public B
{
public:
    virtual ~ExtendsB(){}

    // Not OK! It does not see it as an implementation of 
    // virtual void Run(A* a) = 0;
    virtual void Run(ExtendsA* ea) {}; 
    virtual ExtendsA* Run() { return new ExtendsA(); }; // OK
};

Why C++ allows to change the return type to a sub-class, but not the parameter type?

Is it a good rationale or just a missed point in the language specifications?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T03:19:34+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 3:19 am

    Why C++ allows to change the return type to a sub-class, but not the parameter type?

    C++ standard allows you to use a Covariant return type while overidding virtual functions but does not allow you to modify the function parameters.And yes there is a good rationale behind it.

    Rationale:

    Overriding essentially means that either the Base class method or the Derived class method will be called at run-time depending on the actual object pointed by the pointer.
    It implies that:
    i.e: “Every instance where the Base class method can be called can be replaced by call to Derived class method without any change to calling code.”

    If the above rule was not in place it would leave a window to break the existing code by addition of new functionality(new derived classes).

    If you have a function prototype in derived class which differs from base class virtual function w.r.t parameters then the function does not override the base class function, since the above rule gets broken.

    However, Covariant return types do not break this rule, because upcasting happens implicitly and a Base class pointer can always point to a derived class object without any casting, hence the Standard enforces this condition of covariant return types on return types.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this piece of code that does not work: public CartaoCidadao() { InitializeComponent();
I have this piece of code which check the last customer_id from the db.
I have this piece of code for placing elements from an array into the
I have this piece of code for reading from an excel cell: public T
I have this piece of code which gives to SAXParseError i.e., it is not
I have this piece of code in a function. I want to print the
I have this piece of code: public static DateDialogFragment newInstance(Context context, DateDialogFragmentListener listener) {
I have this piece of code: @Entity @Table(name = MOVERS) public class MOVers implements
I have this piece of code for my images, so the opacity can lower
I have this piece of code, <div id=event style=display:none;> <!-- initially hidden --> <div

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.