Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3230502
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:56:04+00:00 2026-05-17T16:56:04+00:00

I have three classes mapped using the table-per-subclass class mapping strategy. The tables are:

  • 0

I have three classes mapped using the table-per-subclass class mapping strategy. The tables are:

  • Images – ImageId, FileName, ImageData
  • CategoryImages – CategoryId, ImageId
  • ProductImages – ProductId, ImageId

We are mapping like so:

<class name="CatalogImage" table="Images">
<id name="Id" column="ImageId">
  <generator class="guid.comb"/>
</id>
<property name="FileName"/>
<property name="ImageData" lazy="true"/>

<joined-subclass name="CategoryImage" table="CategoryImages">
  <key column="ImageId"/>
  <many-to-one name="Category" column="CategoryId"/>
</joined-subclass>
<joined-subclass name="ProductImage" table="ProductImages">
  <key column="ImageId"/>
  <many-to-one name="Product" column="ProductId"/>
</joined-subclass>

I am able to save instances of Image, CatalogImage and ProductImage.

However, the main reason for composing the image types in this way is so that I have one central image gallery from which I can grab images and attach them to a product, category etc.

This is the part I am struggling with. How can I retrieve an instance of Image and use it to create an instance of ProductImage and upon saving, add the reference to the ProductImage table.

I tried a basic cast (ProductImage)normalImage but this failed as I’m using a dynamic proxy.

Thanks,
Ben

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:56:05+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:56 pm

    You are misusing inheritance. The relationship between a Product/Category and an Image is not “is-a” but “has-a” or “has-many” (composition).

    So, if a Product has many images, with your current database structure you can just map a collection of Images in product; ProductImage is not a class.

    Example:

    class Product
    {
        public virtual ICollection<Image> Images { get; set; }
    }
    

    Mapping:

    <class name"Product">
      ...
      <set name="Images" table="ProductImages">
        <key column="ProductId"/>
        <many-to-many column="ImageId" class="Image"/>
      </set>
    </class>
    

    You can also map two inverse collections of Categories and Products in Image, to see what elements it has been attached to.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have three classes: class X{}; class Y{}; class Both : public X,
I have three classes with the following associations: class Technician < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :tickets
Suppose I have three classes. It is valid to instantiate A, but there are
If I have three classes, A, B, C. A and B are friends (bidirectionally).
I have three (C++) classes: Player, Hand, and Card. Player has a member, hand,
I have a three nested classes, Show, Season and Episode, where a show has
Let's say I have a Base class and several Derived classes. Is there any
I have three tables: page, attachment, page-attachment I have data like this: page ID
I am having an issue with many-to-many mapping using NHibernate. Basically I have 2
i have a table like this one: id | name | score mapped to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.