Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 511249
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:11:50+00:00 2026-05-13T07:11:50+00:00

I have various classes that wrap an IntPtr . They don’t store their own

  • 0

I have various classes that wrap an IntPtr. They don’t store their own data (other than the pointer), but instead use properties and methods to expose the data at the pointer using an unmanaged library. It works well, but I’ve gotten to the point where I need to be able to refer to these wrapper objects from other wrapper objects. For example:

public class Node {
    private IntPtr _ptr;

    public Node Parent {
        get { return new Node(UnmanagedApi.GetParent(_ptr)); }
    }

    internal Node(IntPtr ptr) {
        _ptr = ptr;
    }
}

Now, I can simply return a new Node(parentPtr) (as above), but there is the potential for having tens of thousands of nodes. Wouldn’t this be a bad idea, since multiple wrapper objects could end up referring to the same IntPtr?

What can I do to fix this? I thought about using a static KeyedCollection class that uses each IntPtr as the key. So, instead of returning a new Node each time, I can just look it up. But that would bring up threading issues, right?

Is there a better way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:11:50+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:11 am

    The biggest problem I can see is who is responsible for deleting the objects referred to by the pointer?

    Reusing the same object is not necessarily a threading issue, although if you are responsible for calling delete on the unmanaged objects you’ll need to implement some sort of reference counting in your objects.

    Using multiple objects with the same pointer might be easier if your objects are read-only. If they have state that can be changed then you’ll need to understand the impact of making a change if multiple objects hold a pointer to that state.

    You might also want to look at C++/CLI (managed C++) to provide a layer between the C# and unmanaged library and do the hard work of translation/manipulation in there and provide a simpler API for the C# to work with.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have my own classes that represent image data. They have various underlying structure
I have encountered various classes that don't allow creation of their instance directly. Rather
I have a C++ library that provides various classes for managing data. I have
I have a wxPython application with the various GUI classes in their own modules
I have a number of data classes representing various entities. Which is better: writing
I have a number of classes that represent various computer components, each of which
I have been trying to locate various dependencies and it seems that various classes
I have about 20 simple C++ classes that represent various probability distributions. I would
Suppose I have an event KeyPress subscribed to by various classes. Assume that Class
I have various classes that implements IActiveRecord. I want to have a method where

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.