Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3358208
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T02:43:29+00:00 2026-05-18T02:43:29+00:00

I just finish to implement a generic skip list in C++ an I want

  • 0

I just finish to implement a generic skip list in C++ an I want to bring it an
STL map-like iterator.
The problem arise when overloading the “->” operator: it is required to return a reference to an iterator::value_type, which in my case is std::pair, with K being the key type and V the value type of my map-like container.
The code is the following:

value_type& operator->() { return value_type(inner->key, inner->value); }

The compiler return me some hatred messages about references to temporary objects, and I
completely agree with him; me question is: How the hell should I do to return a reference
to a pair without having to put a pair member in my iterator class ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T02:43:30+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 2:43 am
    value_type& operator->() { return value_type(inner->key, inner->value); }
    

    Your return type is a reference to a value_type, but you return a locally-created instance, which would be destroyed at the end of the function/operator scope (i.e. the closing }.) So you return a garbage reference, which is why your compiler hates you.

    If you instead return by value, you will have correct and functional code. (Whether or not you should return by value depends on the type of value_type.)

    value_type operator->() { return value_type(inner->key, inner->value); }
    

    Even better would be to maintain a single value_type as a member field of your class, but you say you don’t want to, so this is the only other realistic option.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just finish my iPhone game using cocos2d, and I want to submit it
Just learning the world of jquery, and all my googling gives examples like this:
Just a knowledge question which I would like to ask: For example, I have
I just gave a coding interview on codility I was asked the to implement
I'm working to finish a math problem that approximates the square root of a
i just finish some MYSQL to excel script with xlwt and I need to
I just finish my iPhone game using cocos2d. But before I put it on
I would like to implement a broadcast receiver for my internet connection checking. If
i 'm just finish labs meeting with my advisor, previous code is written in
OK, so I just finish reading the implementation of kill(2) of FreeBSD, and am

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.