Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8997953
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T23:57:33+00:00 2026-06-15T23:57:33+00:00

I just ran across the following warning in GCC: warning: implicit dereference will not

  • 0

I just ran across the following warning in GCC:

warning: implicit dereference will not access object of type ‘volatile util::Yield’ in statement [enabled by default]

while compiling this code:

volatile util::Yield y1;
util::Yield y2;
y1 += y2; // <--- Warning triggered here.

and unfortunately I do not quite understand what GCC is trying to tell me…

The class Yield is declared as follows:

class Yield {
public:
    Yield();

    Yield &operator+=(Yield const &other);
    Yield &operator+=(Yield const volatile &other);
    Yield volatile &operator+=(Yield const &other) volatile;
    Yield volatile &operator+=(Yield const volatile &other) volatile;

    // Other operators snipped...
};

Any ideas?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T23:57:34+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 11:57 pm

    From the GCC manual, Section 6.1 – When is a Volatile Object Accessed?

    When using a reference to volatile, G++ does not treat equivalent expressions as accesses to volatiles, but instead issues a warning that no volatile is accessed. The rationale for this is that otherwise it becomes difficult to determine where volatile access occur, and not possible to ignore the return value from functions returning volatile references. Again, if you wish to force a read, cast the reference to an rvalue.

    The warning stems from the fact that the += operator returns a reference to a volatile object, and that the expression ‘y1 += y2’ ignores that return value. The compiler is letting you know that the reference will not actually be dereferenced (i.e. the volatile value will not be read).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just ran across the following error: (.gnu.linkonce.[stuff]): undefined reference to [method] [object file]:(.gnu.linkonce.[stuff]):
I just ran across the following line of code: if(someInt <= int.MinValue) { /*
Time for a theoretical question I just ran across. The following code is valid
I just ran across the following syntax in a piece of Haskell code -
I just ran across a question with an answer suggesting the AntiXss library to
I just ran across an issue that probably exposes my ignorance of common threading
I just ran across a problem that took a little while to figure out
I just ran across this javascript snippet: myArray.length--; What does it do exactly?
I just ran across this error message while working in C# A property or
So I just ran across this oddity. It appears that Ubuntu has a feature

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.