Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8397423
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T20:47:11+00:00 2026-06-09T20:47:11+00:00

I just ran into an issue where the value returned by a function is

  • 0

I just ran into an issue where the value returned by a function is different depending on whether or not I call puts on that result. I’m wondering if this is to be expected, or some sort of parser error.

This only occurs if the block passed to the function uses the do...end syntax, not the inline {...} syntax. Here’s an example:

arr = ["a", "b", "c"]
puts i = arr.index { |x| == "b" }
#=> 1

as expected, but this does not work as I’d expect:

arr = ["a", "b", "c"]
puts i = arr.index do |x|
  x == "b"
end
#=> #<Enumerator:0xSomeId>

Though it works fine if I do:

arr = ["a", "b", "c"]
i = arr.index do |x|
  x == "b"
end
puts i
#=> 1

It looks like it’s interpreted as if it were passed no block at all (returning the enumerator is the expected behavior of calling arr.index with block). Is this normal? Is this behavior explained/documented anywhere?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T20:47:12+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 8:47 pm

    do...end blocks associate with the leftmost method while {...} blocks associate with the rightmost, due to precedence. In your second example, the block is being associated with puts, which does nothing with it.

    It seems like weird behavior in this case, but it’s this feature of do...end blocks that give a lot of Ruby DSL‘s their clean, readable syntax.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just ran into an issue with a has_many :through association and after/before-destroy callbacks not
Just about everyone has ran into this specific issue: function addLinks () { for
I ran into an issue with something that I am probably just overlooking. I
I just ran into this issue while making a GET request to a node.js
I just ran into a SQL query with about 5 different columns in the
I just ran into something in Visual Studio 2010 RC that wasn't previously happening
I just started playing around with threading today and I ran into something that
I ran into this issue on accident while debugging a faulty string trim function
I just ran into an issue: when I try to access a private or
I just included T4MVC in my project and ran into an issue. I'm passing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.