Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8894683
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T23:33:58+00:00 2026-06-14T23:33:58+00:00

I know from an historical perspective that it has always been frowned upon to

  • 0

I know from an historical perspective that it has always been frowned upon to not gracefully degrade when a visitor with Javascript disabled visits a site but how relevant is this now?

I’m asking since an application I’m building is going to make heavy use of Javascript for charting and user interaction with the charts.

Most of the most popular sites on the web are rendered more or less useless without it enabled. I can’t even login to twitter without it enabled, core bits of Facebook stop working and trying to visit Google maps just redirects to their search home page.

The kind of interaction I’m planning would be next to impossible to do any other way, and even if there was a way there isn’t the resources to develop two versions of things.

The problem I have is that the site also needs to be as accessible as possible. It’s an inherently visual site which makes this problematic to say the least. I’m not even sure there is a solution to this particular problem. If it’s visual it’s not going to be suitable for blind people.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T23:34:00+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 11:34 pm

    This depends entirely on your needs and what you want your demographic to be. A lot of sites use exclusively flash to silverlight; does that make them poorly designed? No. All it means is that the site caters to a very specific audience.

    As long as you are accepting that there may be a (albeit) small populous that aren’t going to use the site (or can’t due to missing support) then it’s fine.

    Side-note: there are other means of conveying graphics other than javascript. Using server-side image generators is one way. You may also decide to use flash/silverlight plugins or activeX/applets. My advice would be to design the site as you see fit.

    I would bet that the amount of javascript support these days is in the majority, so creating the site first then working on the discrepancies later wouldn’t be a bad avenue. Youre still going to receive a high saturation of visitors just on the assumption that most clients support it.

    Heck, look at sites using html5–it’s not a standard, and no browser has to support it, but this still doesn’t stop people from taking advantage of article, header & footer elements. Granted, there is html5shiv to gracefully down-grade it, but even that depends on JS being present.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know from reading the assoc. Google group that there is not currently an
I know that the Hudson vs. CC issue has been beaten (discussed) to death,
I know from wikipedia for example that exception handling is used in an application
I know from here that I can pass an ignore option in the jQuery.validate
I know from Algebra class that with ABC and 123 we can make 216
I have come to know from book that for declaring a structure variable it
So I know from various online sources that it is generally a no-no to
OK, so I know that from-import is exactly the same as import , except
I have a subclass with an over-ridden method that I know always returns a
I know from this question that var i = 1 and int i =

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.