Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8157385
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T17:16:01+00:00 2026-06-06T17:16:01+00:00

I know i can match numbers with Pattern.compile(\\d*); But it doesn’t handle the long

  • 0

I know i can match numbers with Pattern.compile("\\d*");

But it doesn’t handle the long min/max values.

For performence issues related to exceptions i do not want to try to parse the long unless it is really a long.

if ( LONG_PATTERN.matcher(timestampStr).matches() ) {
    long timeStamp = Long.parseLong(timestampStr);
    return new Date(timeStamp);
} else {
    LOGGER.error("Can't convert " + timestampStr + " to a Date because it is not a timestamp! -> ");
    return null;
}

I mean i do not want any try/catch block and i do not want to get exceptions raised for a long like “564654954654464654654567879865132154778” which is out of the size of a regular Java long.

Does someone has a pattern to handle this kind of need for the primitive java types?
Does the JDK provide something to handle it automatically?
Is there a fail-safe parsing mecanism in Java?

Thanks


Edit: Please assume that the “bad long string” is not an exceptionnal case.
I’m not asking for a benchmark, i’m here for a regex representing a long and nothing more.
I’m aware of the additionnal time required by the regex check, but at least my long parsing will always be constant and never be dependent of the % of “bad long strings”

I can’t find the link again but there is a nice parsing benchmark on StackOverflow which clearly shows that reusing the sams compiled regex is really fast, a LOT faster than throwing an exception, thus only a small threshold of exceptions whould make the system slower than with the additionnal regex check.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T17:16:02+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 5:16 pm

    The minimum avlue of a long is -9,223,372,036,854,775,808, and the maximum value is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807. So, a maximum of 19 digits. So, \d{1,19} should get you there, perhaps with an optional -, and with ^ and $ to match the ends of the string.

    So roughly:

    Pattern LONG_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("^-?\\d{1,19}$");
    

    …or something along those lines, and assuming you don’t allow commas (or have already removed them).

    As gexicide points out in the comments, the above allows a small (in comparison) range of invalid values, such as 9,999,999,999,999,999,999. You can get more complex with your regex, or just accept that the above will weed out the vast majority of invalid numbers and so you reduce the number of parsing exceptions you get.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm building a little search application (I know I can use match against). But
I know i can do something like ab[^c]+def which should match ab_blah_hi_blah_def but is
I have a query that I know can be done using a subselect, but
You can know if the event stack is empty calling the gtk.events_pending() method, but
I know I can purchase it for $299.00, but my primary reason for upgrading
I know it has been asked many times... but I can't seem to figure
I was wondering how can I match two digits but which are not the
This is something I know can be done somehow , because I've done it
I need to know can we add image in TextArea through StyleableTextField htmlText because
I know you can ALTER the column order in MySQL with FIRST and AFTER,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.