Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 301879
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T07:02:47+00:00 2026-05-12T07:02:47+00:00

I know that local variables and paramters of methods live in stack, but I

  • 0

I know that local variables and paramters of methods live in stack, but I not able to figure out where does actually methods live in case of Java?

If I declare any Thread object like:

Thread t=new Thread();
t.start();

So it means I’ve created a separate calling of methods apart from main method. What does it mean? Does it mean calling of separate sequence of methods over Stack memory? Am I right?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T07:02:47+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:02 am

    Each thread is allocated its own stack.

    This article has a good introduction to the memory separation within a Java process.

    Inside the Java virtual machine, each
    thread is awarded a Java stack, which
    contains data no other thread can
    access, including the local variables,
    parameters, and return values of each
    method the thread has invoked. The
    data on the stack is limited to
    primitive types and object references.
    In the JVM, it is not possible to
    place the image of an actual object on
    the stack. All objects reside on the
    heap.

    I’ve seen many scenarios where clients have implemented hugely threaded servers on the basis that each thread does very little, and they run into problems with memory. That’s because each thread is allocated its own stack, and this (obviously) adds up. I think the default value is 512k per thread, but I’ve not found a canonical source for that.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that with anonymous functions, local stack variables are promoted to a class,
It's known that big local/global variables may cause to a stack overflow. I know
I like to know why Variables that are local to a method cannot be
I know that if an IP falls outside the Subnet Mask + Local IP
I know that |DataDirectory| will resolve to App_Data in an ASP.NET application but is
I know that IList is the interface and List is the concrete type but
I'm using pthreads that don't allocate any local variables. For reasons I won't go
I am running a LINQ query that is using local let variables to calculate
I know that lambda expressions within loops can cause problems if they use local
I know that I can do something like $int = (int)99; //(int) has a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.