Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1115589
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T03:10:48+00:00 2026-05-17T03:10:48+00:00

I know this was a contentious issue five years ago, but I’m wondering if

  • 0

I know this was a contentious issue five years ago, but I’m wondering if things have changed for today’s JavaScript. Are there any real world examples of a major modern library being incompatible with extending Object.prototype?

I’m not interested in hypothetical “someone may write bad for in iteration code in a library that you want to use, maybe, in the future, and then you might get a weird bug”

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T03:10:48+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:10 am

    Are there any real world examples of a major modern library being incompatible with extending Object.prototype?

    Yes, I remember problems with jQuery, -which is one of the less intrusive libraries- for example:

    • I tried to prototype a length() method to Object and broke jQuery – how?

    Another case that I remember is that someone added a load function to the Object.prototype object, and it caused problems with the $().load event:

    // DON'T DO THIS ! :)
    Object.prototype.load = function () {};
    
    ​$(window).load(function () {
      alert('load event'); // never fired
    });​
    

    Example here.

    Augmenting the Object.prototype object in that way is never recommended, because those properties will be inherited by a great number of objects -even also by some host objects-, and as you know, the primary concern is that they will be enumerated by the for-in statement.

    In ECMAScript 5, now a safer way exist, because we can now declare non-enumerable properties, for example:

    Object.defineProperty(Object.prototype, 'foo', { value: 'bar' });
    

    In the property descriptor –{ value: 'bar' }– we can specify property attributes, in the case of Value Properties as in the above example, we can specify the writable attribute, and the common configurable attribute (determines if a property can be re-configured -attribute changes- or deleted.

    And we have also the enumerable attribute, which determines if the property will be enumerated by the for-in statement.

    If we don’t specify the attributes, they are false by default, the descriptor will look like:

    {
      value: 'bar',
      writable: false,
      configurable: false,
      enumerable: false
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know this is a fairly contentious issue amongst programmers, but when developing I
I know this isn't strictly a programming question but y'all must have experienced this.
Know this might be rather basic, but I been trying to figure out how
I know this isn't the most ideal solution, but I need to add an
I know this is probably really dumb, but I can't figure out why this
I know this might be a no-brainer, but please read on. I also know
I know this is a broad question, but I've inherited several poor performers and
I know this is not programming directly, but it's regarding a development workstation I'm
I know there are things out there to help to optimize queries, ect... but
I know this question has probably been answered over 200 times and I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.