Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 998345
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:10:44+00:00 2026-05-16T07:10:44+00:00

I must admit, I am not even sure if I put the question right…

  • 0

I must admit, I am not even sure if I put the question right…

In my app I have a bunch of named scopes to build more efficient finds.
The one that I can’t get to work is this:

=> I want to find all products in the current category and its descendants. I use the ‘ancestry’ gem to build the tree, and it provides named scopes on the Class level:

subtree_of(node)        #Subtree of node, node can be either a record or an id

so I thought it would be a good idea to have a named_scope like this:

named_scope :in_tree, :include => :category, :conditions => ['category in (?)', (subtree_of(@category)) ]

or

named_scope :in_tree, :include => :category, :conditions => ['category in (?)', (@category.subtree_ids) ]

Both things work in controllers and helpers, but not in the model … and when I am not mistaken it comes down to “@category” (I have it defined in the controller) being not available in the model.

Is there a railsy way to make it available?

Thanks for your help!

Val

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:10:45+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:10 am

    It doesn’t work in your model because @category is an instance variable that lives within your controllers. You can pass the category into the named scope using a lambda (anonymous function):

    named_scope :in_tree, lambda { |category| { :include => :category,
      :conditions => ['category in (?)', (subtree_of(category)) ] }}
    

    or

    named_scope :in_tree, lambda { |category| { :include => :category,
      :conditions => ['category in (?)', (category.subtree_ids) ] }} 
    

    Now in your controllers/helpers you can use the named scope using Product.in_tree(@category).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've not used Zombies before, and must admit I'm not that sure what it's
I must admit that I don't really know if this is the right place
I have just installed Microsoft Robotics Studio 2008 R2, and I must admit that
I must admit, I am not a mathematical expert, thats why I cant solve
I must admit that I am incredibly jealous of those developers who happen to
I must admit the HTML5 semantic markup confuses me. I'm talking about these tags
I must admin this is kind of funny even though I think I understand
This must be a stupid question, but nevertheless I find it curious: Say I
I must admit my grasp of the more complex abilities of WCF confound me,
I have come across a website that appears to use Ajax but does not

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.