Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7653945
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T12:09:14+00:00 2026-05-31T12:09:14+00:00

I often find myself wanting to insert regular functions into a binded sequence. Like

  • 0

I often find myself wanting to insert regular functions into a “binded” sequence. Like in this contrived example:

getLine >>= lift (map toUpper) >>= putStrLn

I need to define the lift function lift :: (a -> b) -> a -> m b to make this work. Problem is I don’t know of such a function, and Hoogle doesn’t seem to either. I find this odd since this makes totally sense to me.

Now, there are probably other ways to make this work, but I like the way point-free style code allows me to scan the line in one pass to figure out what is happening.

let lift f x = return (f x) in
getLine >>= lift (map toUpper) >>= putStrLn

My question boils down to this: am I missing something or how come there isn’t a function like lift. My experience in Haskell is still very limited, so I am assuming that most people solve this in a different way. Can someone explain to me the idiomatic way of solving this.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T12:09:16+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 12:09 pm

    There are three idiomatic ways.

    1. Don’t use bind; use the first hit on your Hoogle search instead:

      liftM (map toUpper) getLine >>= putStrLn
      

      There are a variety of alternative spellings of liftM, such as fmap or (<$>).

    2. Inline the lift function you defined:

      getLine >>= return . map toUpper >>= putStrLn
      
    3. Use the monad laws to fuse the last two binds in option 2:

      getLine >>= putStrLn . map toUpper
      
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find myself often wanting to write Python list comprehensions like this: nearbyPoints =
This is a very simple question. I often find myself wanting to create a
I often find myself wanting to compile an example file included in a larger
I often find myself writing class constructors like this: class foo: def __init__(self, arg1,
I often find myself wanting to write an SQL query like the following: SELECT
Often times, I find myself navigating very deep into a directory and wanting to
I really like vim's fuzzyfinder plugin, but I often find myself wanting to open
I often find myself into this: .class { border-top:1px dashed #0000000; border-bottom:1px dashed #0000000;
I often find myself wanting to debug CSS layout issues that involve DOM changes
I seem to often find myself wanting to store data of more than one

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.