Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6802913
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T19:16:50+00:00 2026-05-26T19:16:50+00:00

I often see code like this: // Approach 1 if(data != nil){ // Do

  • 0

I often see code like this:

// Approach 1
if(data != nil){
    // Do this and that
}

When one could simply do the check like this:

// Approach 2
if(data){
    // Do this and that
}

To me the second approach seems to be much better since it is shorter and easier to read.

So why should one use the first approach at all?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T19:16:50+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 7:16 pm

    This is mostly a style preference, or some people does not know that it is possible to use first solution.

    Moreover, they are languages like java where you can’t write the second solution, You must write yourVar != null

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm still learning ASP.NET and I often see code like this throughout parts of
I often see code like that which is shown here , ie where an
Where I work, I often see code like that : public void Test(Models.User.UserInfo userInfo,
In threads when dealing with cancelation, you often you see code like this while
Often I see code like this scattered and duplicated around source code: var handler
I often see the code which uses mock in Rspec, like this: describe GET
I often see code like: Iterator i = list.iterator(); while(i.hasNext()) { ... } but
I often see code like int hashCode(){ return a^b; } Why XOR?
You often see, on sites like The Daily WTF , examples of overengineered code
I have an example of some code that I see often in websites that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.