Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8823119
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T06:16:30+00:00 2026-06-14T06:16:30+00:00

I often see developers add methods to their own jquery Widget by extending the

  • 0

I often see developers add methods to their own jquery Widget by extending the widget object. I’m not certain I really understand why and would appreciate if somebody could explain.

For example, the author(s) of jQuery UI Autocomplete Widget add 2 methods to their widget, why didn’t they just have it in the original widget object?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T06:16:32+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 6:16 am

    These utility functions don’t access any of the widget’s internal data, so they don’t need to be within the widget function. The names are put into the widget’s namespace to prevent polluting the global namespace.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I often see web developers use the following: *, html { margin: 0; padding:0;
I often see other developers naming libraries with CORE. What does it actually mean?
I was curious how often other software developers reevaluated their development environments and tools.
Here's a common practice I see often (including from a very popular iPhone developer
I often see code a function defined without visibility keywords. e.g: class Foo() {
I often see the code like this: public abstract class AbstractDataReader { public void
I often see two conflicting strategies for method interfaces, loosely summarized as follows: //
I often see two styles, INSERT select and insert into select, what are the
I often see people asking XML/XSLT related questions here that root in the inability
I often see code like int hashCode(){ return a^b; } Why XOR?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.