Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 804735
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T23:57:59+00:00 2026-05-14T23:57:59+00:00

I ran into a problem as I tried to create two TIMESTAMP columns in

  • 0

I ran into a problem as I tried to create two TIMESTAMP columns in my database. One called created and one called updated. I figured it would be easy to set the default value of both to CURRENT_TIMESTAMP and then ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP for the updated column. But for some reason MySQL means that’s a bad idea… so I have been looking for ways to do this without having to set one of them in the insert query.

I found one way by using a trigger in this answer, but I keep getting errors. I just managed to actually create the trigger, but now I get errors when I try to insert new rows claiming that

1442 – Can’t update table ‘tasks’ in stored function/trigger because it is already used by statement which invoked this stored function/trigger.

And I don’t get what that means at all. So, I was hoping someone here could shed some light up this subject.

The SQL I used to create the table and the trigger is as follows:

CREATE TABLE `tasks` (
  `id` INT(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `created` DATETIME,
  `updated` TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  `title` VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
  `notes` TEXT,
  `status_id` INT(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `status_id` (`status_id`),
  CONSTRAINT `fk_tasks_statuses` FOREIGN KEY (`status_id`) REFERENCES `statuses` (`id`),
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;


CREATE TRIGGER task_creation_timestamp AFTER INSERT ON tasks 
FOR EACH ROW
UPDATE tasks SET created = updated WHERE id = NEW.id;

What am I doing wrong here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T23:57:59+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 11:57 pm

    Your trigger needs to be “before insert”, and you need to use SET instead of UPDATE:

    CREATE TRIGGER task_creation_timestamp BEFORE INSERT ON tasks 
    FOR EACH ROW
    SET NEW.created = NOW();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I ran into the problem that my primary key sequence is not in sync
I've ran into a problem while trying to test following IRepository based on NHibernate:
I recently ran into a problem that I thought boost::lambda or boost::phoenix could help
I recently ran into a problem with a COM object that was using a
I'm writing a C parser using PLY, and recently ran into a problem. This
I know this question has been asked before, but I ran into a problem.
Today, I ran into this weird problem with a user using Mac OS X.
Ok, so I just ran into the following problem that raised an eyebrow. For
A problem I ran into a while back I never found a good solution
Here's a problem I ran into recently. I have attributes strings of the form

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.