Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7775091
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T17:32:33+00:00 2026-06-01T17:32:33+00:00

I read through the comments here: Is this a reasonable user registration process? but

  • 0

I read through the comments here: Is this a reasonable user registration process? but wanted to see if anyone had any further opinions since my application is public facing.

My current setup has the user enter an email/password. The email is checked for uniqueness and if ok, the info is written as inactive and a link is sent in an email to the address provided. The link contains a guid that’s generated, as well as the email address as part of the a link they need to click to complete the registration. The link is good for 12 hours.

When they click the link and everything comes through ok, they are set to active and logged in.

The problem we’re experiencing is if there’s a lag in the send people tend to sign up again and again. Also, there’s a 60% “loss” in people NOT coming back to activate. I thought this may be due to the webserver sending the emails, but it’s routed through our SMPT server now and I’ve checked with the gmail/hotmail/yahoo addresses to confirm they’re NOT going to junk now.

I’m getting pressure from the “higher ups” to remove the requirement to go to email to validate. The biggest issue I see in taking it out would be someone could register someone else’s email or mistype their own email when they sign up and then the valid email holder could later reset the password, and access their info. The site has a social aspect and allows users to store personal information so I don’t want to open it to that exposure if possible.

Is there a middle ground I’m not thinking of? I’ve been told Twitter and other big sites do NOT require email validation… not sure if they have something else in place or just don’t worry about the issue.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T17:32:35+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 5:32 pm

    As a follow-up, the solution we’re looking to pursue will now allow people to sign-up WITHOUT having to go to email and confirm. When they do, a cookie will be added for the current computer and they’re free to start using the account. The next time they come in, if the cookie is found it will notify them they SHOULD validate (but not require it). If no cookie is found, they MUST validate.

    This will reduce “friction” for users to get in, but puts the onus on them to complete the process and makes it clear they’re operating in a less-than-ideal mode.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read through quite a few similar questions here on SO but none were
I've read through some of the post on here about closures and currying but
I've read several comments here and elsewhere suggesting that Erlang's process dictionary was a
I have read through the solutions to similar problems, but they all seem to
I've read through a few other threads on here, though none of them really
SOLVED: Read the comments below @Eray. I have a PHP function to look through
Okay I've read through the plugin comments and the docs as well and I
Im not sure if i have explaned this the best i can but, here
I have read several comments here that dBase is a dead system and no
I'm pretty new to Objective-C. I've read through a similar question but I can't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.