Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8871825
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T18:05:08+00:00 2026-06-14T18:05:08+00:00

I think I may be missing something coming to object reference, in the below

  • 0

I think I may be missing something coming to object reference, in the below case, is this refering to the test object? If not how can I declare b so in the end test.a = test.b ?

test = {
 a: 1,
 b: this.a,
 check : function(){
  console.log(test.a); // returns 1
  console.log(test.b); // returns undefined
 }
};
test.check();

Thanks a lot

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T18:05:09+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 6:05 pm

    You can declare it like this:

    function test(){
       this.a = 1;
       this.b = this.a;
    
        this.check = function(){
           console.log(this.a);  // output 1
           console.log(this.b); // output 1
        }        
    }
    
    var t = new test();
    t.check();
    

    Live example: http://jsfiddle.net/Rqs86/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm not sure if this is a bug or I'm just missing something (although
I may be missing something in the standard libs, but I don't think so.
I think I may be missing something fundamental from the list-json xpath architecture. The
I think I may have implemented this incorrectly because the results do not make
Not sure, but I think this may be a bug? Here is my model:
I think I may be missing something here or my understanding of rails model
I think I may be missing something or haven't grasped a fundamental of jQuery.
I think I may have used a repeater when I should have used something
I think I may misunderstand why the with command is used. But can any
Since I'm not a native English speaker I might be missing something so maybe

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.