Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6846755
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T00:39:44+00:00 2026-05-27T00:39:44+00:00

I (think I) understand that you can only retrieve the size of an array

  • 0

I (think I) understand that you can only retrieve the size of an array (using sizeof) if it is declared at compile time on the stack, e.g.

int my_array[] = {1,2,3};
sizeof(my_array) == 3;

As soon as you start using pointers you lose this length information.

e.g. if you pass a pointer to int as a function parameter to get an int array into a function you can no longer use sizeof() in this way, it will just return the number of bytes used to store a pointer.

Clearly, it is vital to know how long your arrays are.

So which of the following options should I use when passing arrays around?

  1. Pass a pointer and an accompanying length parameter

    int my_func(int *my_array, size_t len_my_array)

  2. Create my own vector struct

    struct vector {
       int *my_array;
       size_t len;
    }
    
    int my_func(struct vector *my_vector)
    
  3. Use someone elses vector implementation. (Is there a default implementation for C as there is for C++?)

  4. Another approach which I’ve missed?

(I’m currently using the 1st option but its a bit unwieldy and I’m keen to know if this is considered poor programming practice)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T00:39:45+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 12:39 am

    The standard way is to utilize the first approach and pass a pointer and a size especially if you want your code to be reused by others.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think that is not easy to understand what I need reading title, so
I am new to using numpy and one thing that I really don't understand
I think I understand strong typing , but every time I look for examples
I'm sorry that I haven't deeply understood HBase and Hadoop MapReduce, but I think
I think understand the idea of duck typing, and would like to use it
I think I understand the basic principals of T4 but I'm having a hard
I think I understand the happened-before relationship for single variables. If I write a
I think I understand OSPF - it is Link-State routing, with a domain split
I understand the regular fixed-point type combinator and I think I understand the higher-order
Two days ago I wrote this question: How can I retrieve an object on

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.