Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 140277
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:35:09+00:00 2026-05-11T07:35:09+00:00

I think it’s a good practise to always return empty lists or arrays instead

  • 0

I think it’s a good practise to always return empty lists or arrays instead of null when a method comes up with no results to avoid null checks in the code.

Because Rhino Mocks returns the default value for an object, which is null for lists and arrays, a lot of times I have to either add the null checks back in or setup the mocks with expectations to return lists.

Is there a way to configure or extend Rhino Mocks with this behaviour?

var repositoryMock = MockRepository.GenerateMock<ICustomerRepository>(); IList<Customer> customers = repositoryMock.getCustomers();  Assert.IsNotNull(customers); Assert.AreEqual(0, customers.Count ); 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:35:09+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:35 am

    Turns out that this behaviour is possible with Moq as long as the returned object is IEnumerable. The following tests pass:

    [Test] public void EmptylListTest() {     var repositoryMock = new Mock<ICustomerRepository>();      IEnumerable<Customer> customers = repositoryMock.Object.GetCustomers();      Assert.IsNotNull(customers);     Assert.AreEqual(0, customers.Count()); }  [Test] public void EmptyArrayTest() {     var repositoryMock = new Mock<ICustomerRepository>();      Customer[] customerArray = repositoryMock.Object.GetCustomerArray();      Assert.IsNotNull(customerArray);     Assert.AreEqual(0, customerArray.Length); }  public interface ICustomerRepository {     IEnumerable<Customer> GetCustomers();     Customer[] GetCustomerArray(); } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 118k
  • Answers 118k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm going to echo everyone else, but I'll just encourage… May 11, 2026 at 11:39 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The conditional operator in C++ can return an lvalue, whereas… May 11, 2026 at 11:39 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer As of OS 3.0 the Navigation Controller has a tool… May 11, 2026 at 11:39 pm

Related Questions

I think it can be done by applying the transformation matrix of the scenegraph
I think it important to have an undo method ala gmail when destroying records
I think it's better to release the version of the software which your developers
I think it's a good practise to always return empty lists or arrays instead
I think it's possible with jQuery, but any ASP.NET serverside code is good for

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.