Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 140277
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:35:09+00:00 2026-05-11T07:35:09+00:00

I think it’s a good practise to always return empty lists or arrays instead

  • 0

I think it’s a good practise to always return empty lists or arrays instead of null when a method comes up with no results to avoid null checks in the code.

Because Rhino Mocks returns the default value for an object, which is null for lists and arrays, a lot of times I have to either add the null checks back in or setup the mocks with expectations to return lists.

Is there a way to configure or extend Rhino Mocks with this behaviour?

var repositoryMock = MockRepository.GenerateMock<ICustomerRepository>(); IList<Customer> customers = repositoryMock.getCustomers();  Assert.IsNotNull(customers); Assert.AreEqual(0, customers.Count ); 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:35:09+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:35 am

    Turns out that this behaviour is possible with Moq as long as the returned object is IEnumerable. The following tests pass:

    [Test] public void EmptylListTest() {     var repositoryMock = new Mock<ICustomerRepository>();      IEnumerable<Customer> customers = repositoryMock.Object.GetCustomers();      Assert.IsNotNull(customers);     Assert.AreEqual(0, customers.Count()); }  [Test] public void EmptyArrayTest() {     var repositoryMock = new Mock<ICustomerRepository>();      Customer[] customerArray = repositoryMock.Object.GetCustomerArray();      Assert.IsNotNull(customerArray);     Assert.AreEqual(0, customerArray.Length); }  public interface ICustomerRepository {     IEnumerable<Customer> GetCustomers();     Customer[] GetCustomerArray(); } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think title should be good enough.
think about this: StreamReader reader = null; try { reader = new StreamReader(_fileName); }
I think my point is clear, under any condition, could this throw null-reference exception?
I think I might have discovered an error in the Uri.IsWellFormedUriString method, it might
I think the file that is produced is an .asm file, any idea how
I think most people know how to do this via the GUI (right click
I think most people here understand the importance of fully automated builds. The problem
I think this is specific to IE 6.0 but... In JavaScript I add a
I think it can be done by applying the transformation matrix of the scenegraph
I think that java executables (jar files) are trivial to decompile and get the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.